My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CC 06-12-1978
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
City Council
>
City Council Minutes
>
1970-1979
>
1978
>
CC 06-12-1978
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/24/2024 9:35:42 AM
Creation date
11/27/2006 10:26:10 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General (2)
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
11
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
. Minutes o�� Regular Council Meefing June 12, 1978 <br />Page 7 <br />Crichton mo�ed, seconded by Vdoodburn, that Gouncil deny th� requested <br />Ap neigh4 and IO" 4ront setback varlances.for the major Norfihwestern <br />Nationai Bank sign. Mot;on carried�tCrichtcn, Woodburn. Wingert, <br />Crepeau votfng in favor of i-he mafion; Hanson voti�g in opposifilon). <br />. <br />• <br />Miiler explainad that the on-site traffie cantrol stgns are:.n�t, <br />in hi� InYer�'!�taRion of fihe sign ordinance, regulated {no inter- , <br />pretatia� from the Cfty Attorney); the Planning Commisston has <br />recommended a reductfoes in $he sizes of some og the on-site sfgns: <br />Park Auto 8ank from 5°5"x7' to 4'x6'x7' <br />Exit trom 4°x6°x8� to 3�x4�x7' <br />Others from 3'x4'5" to 2'x3' <br />CouncPl concurred that un�Pil ord"inance corttrols an established <br />for on-sife tr�affic con�rol/dir�cti�nal signs, signs as proposed <br />be permltted. <br />Klus asked if Councii woui6 recon�fider the setback varfance if <br />the height vardance cannot tre epproved.. Council egresd to re- <br />conslder�its iormer motion, at the request of Northxestern 6ank, <br />i€ a si#e iina drawing to support the s�tback variance ts sub- <br />mltted. <br />Case No. 78-15 Lo4 S iit and Consolidatfon - Ketth Harstad <br />M111er referred. Counc(1 to Certiflcate of Survey t-15- 1 and <br />m�p indieating tocation o{ i.ots 16 and I?, Block 1, Karth lake <br />Estai�es; explained that the proposed !at split and consotida#lon <br />is beirag propo�9ed fo aecommodate a tenn[s coe�rt on Lofi-17 inot <br />a part of �hls appl[eatiqn); reductlon of Lot 16, a� proposed,• <br />results i�a area of Lot Ib being iess than tha required 14,000 <br />square ft. re quiring a varianca. <br />Kat^th Harstad csxplained 4hat actua! implementation of tbe lot split <br />and eonsolidaf3o� �iil be xfthheld peading th� publtc hearing o� <br />the tannts cour? 10' fence, whtch �ill encroach on fihe side yards � <br />of iot 17. Ha�-stad said if tennts court can be located over the <br />i0' drainage easement.across Yhe back of lof f7, a split of 54' <br />' ins4e�d of 60', aould be suft(cient (survey dated fi-8-78? and <br />iot !6 rould nat be �edueed in slze belox th3 14,000 square foot <br />aripi�ww lo� size. �• <br />-- --_ _ , . <br />C�i� �M�t��IY 1tsMwl�ed xith the lot s��f• �r! �M fl�Ian <br />cr+►c�rld, ►r�slk! +P�+1 �Mlther resultant iot �►oalC Ife leerf M�sa <br />, 14000 sq, ft.; ttara'�atlr�s reqnested to verf#q xith fihe City <br />Engtneer, prior to tF�e PGbITc Nearing, that tbs easaments are not <br />�s�tisl � c�4trrcti� af a toaais CDUFt over the draiamge <br />, a+�� rt�ttA�r �i��rts � 4�si� 17 r�rl� ►� a�rynr�ri+rh. , <br />- _ __ . - ,. _ 1 <br />r�iller referr�ci Gounci! ta drawing of propos�d o , <br />Bethel Coli�g� is requesting for funding pur.�oses for the two dormitortes <br />under construei-io�; notad thst parcel does nat front on a"pubiic" <br />sfirse#. <br />Ir� discussion, it was noied thet Befihei Co!lage caanpus is under <br />� a Specia! Use Fermit; if pareel were sold, n3e Mould hava to be <br />far college purposes. Coneern raas ezpressed re Cii�y's Ifabllity <br />because of no Fubiic access to the praper4y. <br />• WEl1g6P'f' moved, ssconded by Crlchton, #hat� Counctl approve the !ot <br />spllt, subject to approval by �he City Ai'torney of assurance tfiat <br />Beth�l Colfege miii guarantee aCC@95 to the subJec4 property if <br />the proper'hy is soFd. Motion carried unantmc�usty. <br />Case No, 77-27, Land&caDe Bond - Mutual Service insurance Compan <br />Miller repor?eE that the landscaping, not tncluding the entrance <br />pMantings, on fhe.P9utuai Servic� insurance Compae�y property is <br />estimated at SS4,030; no4ed #hat performance bond requirement is <br />es1'abiishea a? 125$. <br />Wingeri- maved, seconded by Nanson, #hat Council approve the acceptance <br />of a iandscapa bond for the Mutual 5ervic�.dovelopment in the amount <br />of $#I7;660. P9otion carried unanimously. <br />, <br />_ 7 _ <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.