CC 09-13-1971 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

,:? Minutes of Council Meeting Page two September 13, 1911' Contractor Claim Motion was made by Hollenhorst, seconded by Henderson, that Dunkley Surfacing Company Claim No. I, In the amount of $38,815.14, be p~ld. Motion carried unanimously. REPORT OF COUNCILMAN JOHN HOLLENHORST " I Case No. 71-25 S ecial Use Permit - McGulres Motel Councilman Hollenhors reported that the lann ng ommlsslon recommends amending the Arden HII Is Zoning Ordinance to permit hotels In R-U Zoning; rezoning of the McGuire's property from G-B to R-B; amending. the ordinance definition of motel. A public hearing on the above matters was scheduled by the Planning Commission for Tuesday, October 5, 1911, at 8:00 p.m. a~ the Village Hall. Case No. 71-26. Special Use Permit for a Planned Unit Development _ Partrid~e Construction Company Councilman Hollenhorst reviewed the Minutes of the Planning Commission Meeting of September 7, 1971, and reported on the Public Hearing held. He stated that the Planning Commission recommends approval of the general concept of the plans for the townhouses and condominiums with_ out giving any specific appr~vals. Counc Ilman Ho II enhorst' stat'jd that he wou I d II ke to go on record personally as approving the overal I plan for the townhouses and the condominiums. -. Mr. Donald Partridge, ~ev~loper, ~nd his architect, Mr. Reuben Johnson, Buetow and Associates, discussed the proposal and answered questions. After further diSCUSSion, motion was made by Hollenhorst, seconded by Olmen, that a conceptional approval, as per attached resolution No.~JI be granted for the c6ndomi~lums and townhouses only, with no specific special use permit to be granted until detailed plans have been sub- mitted to the Arden Hills Planning Commission and to the Village Council; above action to be subject to Village Attorney's review of the mailed legal notices and of the Village Engineer's approval of drainage plans. Motion approved unanimously. Case No. 71-32, Special Use Permit - Fami.l.Y:::t_'iP-!..Fost_er Home. After Council dlscussiCln of the matter, and a revlew.of the recollllllendatlons of the Planning Commls';lon of September 1, l!llI, motion was milCle by Hollenhorst, seconded oy Henderson, that the Special Use Permit for a family-type foster home, at 1377 Cummings Lane, as submitted with Case No. 71-32, be denied tor the fol lowing reasons: I. The buildlnr is not really suitable for occupancy of 10 persons. 2. There Is strong objection of '..II... proposal by the neighbors. 3. These was ~ recent unfortunate foster home .~perience .In this house. 4. Children ~lOuld probably find It difficult to make friends' and the necessity of proving themselves would probably be felt, which Is not what a group home Is trying to establish. Motion carried unanimously. I Case No. 71-9. 8ulldlng Permit Application - Bethel Cal lege A~ad.mlc Building Comple;< of Six Buildings. '. Councilman Holfenhorst reviewed the Planning Commission recommendations of September 7, 1971. Motion was made by HolJenhorst, seconded by Olmen, that approval be given for the six-building complex, as per plans submitted wit'l Case No. 71-9, subject to the approval of landscap. plans by the Arden Hi tis Planning Commission. Motion carried unanimouSly. Case No. 71-9, Bethel College Road Access to Old Highway 10. Councilman Nollenhorst referred to the Planning Comm-lsslonMlnutes, dated Sept~mber 7, 1911, and reported that the Planning CommissIon recommends approval of the new road under construction, from Old Highway 10 onto t~e Bethel campus grounds. The road Is shown on an OVer-ail site pla~ submitted to the Village several years ago. Mayor Crepeau reported that the Public Safety Committee recommends approval of the road. -2-