CC 05-12-1969 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

� ' MR. RICHI�RD i7EYER5, 1758 Venus Avenuea Asked if the Council could order the construction of the improvement immediately but forego awarding of the contracts in order to avoid jeopardizing receipt of the federal grant. Also asked why the federal grant would be applied against the portion of the i.mprovement to be paid by general taxes rather than that portion to be paid by assessments. Wanted to know if it would be legal to apply the grant to the other portions of the viliage. • MR. RAY�iOND FARICY, Attorney at Law, NLinneaota Building, St. Paul, Minnesota, representing Columbia Transit Companye Asked for an explanation of the change in location of water lines from the 1968 plan to the current plan. One of the changes he indicated is a water line now running in front of the school and he asked 1£ the school district would be assessed. Also wanted to know if the school district had requested the water. Rurthex asked why the cost of the improve- ment remained substantially the same when the system has been enlarged. NII2. JEROi�� TIP9i�i, 1400 Cummings Lane: If construct3.drr must be done in the boulevards, would they be restored. �. EUGENE GAZELKA, 3263 North Snelling: Asked if the proposed location of the water line in the area of the southeast corner of Lake Johanna could be changed so that he and his neighbors could avoid the cost of running the line 700 feet to their homes. It was expla�,ned that it was impossible to obtain easements to run the line as he suggested. Further asked if the line could be run in at an angle rather than along the highway. PAR. I�RBERT KULt�IAiv, 3279 North Snellinge Asked if everyone in P�tr, Gezelka's area had been personally contacted about the easements. Also asked if the line could be angled after it passed the property of those who had refused to give easements. Further mentioned that if they have to run their lines 700 feet from the highway, there wouldn't be enough water pressure to make it feasible. �