CC 05-12-1969 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

�� �iRe RALPH ENGEL, 3265 �orth Snellingo Lives in the same area under discussion and asked if one of the existing lines couldn't be run northward to acco�modate those people who would prefer to have the line closer to the lake than Snelling Avenue. iiR. ELP��R ISARSEN, 3426 Glen Arden Court: He and some of his neighbors wondered if it was possible to be served by running a water line in their back yards, down the lot line, rather than digging up the boulevards in front. • Mg. ;7ARREN EASTLUND, Attorney at Law, Northwestern Bank Building, i2inneapolis, representing Bethel College and Royal Investment Corporation: Asked for a clarification of the $1 trunk charge. Indicated that his clients own about 250 acres in the improvement area and asked if they would pay the $350 per acre charge and also the $1 trunk charge. P4r. Eastlund pointed out that half of Valentine Lake is incudled in the improvement area and asked if that acreage would be assesaed, Also asked what the formula would be for assessing the library and the school. Asked for a clarification of the acreage and front fo ot charges. If he pays the $350 acreage charge now and later pla ts the property, would the acreage assessments he's paid be credited against the front foot assessment. If not, he felt this would be an inordinately large expense for his clients. Further indicated that at the present time his clients don't need the improvement, don't want it and don't particularly want to pay for it. However, they don't want to stop progress but do want to be treated fairly. �. DOiJ KOSTOHItY2, 1405 6�Iest Arden Place: Asked what action the Council would take if the federal agency failed to indicate within the next week or two whether the grant would be forth- coming. P�IItS. J. W. HAGEiQ, 3435 Siema Court: y,ives on a pie shaped lot and asked for the formula in assessing odd shaped lots. Asked if the total cost of the proposed improvement included the cost of restoring the streets. •