CC 03-12-1979 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

{ - � � � MBNU7ES OF RE6ULAR GOUNC9L MEETING Page fhree March 12, 8979 Hanson noted that there has been n�f'Pfi@6 P98CtFDh fram the resi- denfs in the area" refative to the fiwo but7dtng concept; noted that the 5.foot berms proposed v+t&B be etfective a�P ground leveY but not from the see�ond story oF the homes acrass the st�eet. Mr. Ho86inger, 1974 Benton Way, said tha4 the apartments are nqt consis•t8nt xt�h Hunters Park houses and plan; concerned re densifiy, firat�tic cong�stion, rental property; brick exterior of bui9dings and root Iines aro no# consistent with rood tones and slanted roots of homes in Hunters Park. After furfher ddscnssion, WT�gert a�oved that the apy8fcation for an' Amended SpecTal tlse Permdt be denied, based on the plan pre- sented tonight 4dated 3/12/79� because it fatBs to show an &mprove- ment over the condttions of the existEng SpecBat Use Per�Bt; inteat of motlon Ts io speaK to conftguration of units, aot to unit mix, aoG to not require the 6-month delay for re-app9lcatlon. Motion roras seconded by Crichton. Vn discusslon, Woodbern said that he does not fsel 4hat thera has been suffSclertt restdent tn-pui� on the proposa8; is �ot pre- parad to vote doxn tfie two-bu�Od�ng coocept fionigAt knoa6ng that there Ts no way to prewnt construci•ton of fhe four-buiBding con- cept; moved to table the matter untB@ the March 26th Counci6 MeetTng. Motion was•seconded by Hanson and carrled dMoodburn, lianson, Crepeeu, W6ngert voting In favor of the motion; Grichton �oting in oppositionD. Note: Res6dents of Huntars Park ai01 m�et w3tfi the applicant and Councl� �smbers to provtde ��stdent in-put retative to tfie two- buil6ing/four buildTng apartment compfex, on March 22nd at 7:3� p.m. at the YllOage Ha00, Case Ho. 78-27 S ectaB Use Pera�it .Sor Fence - HoKard Pl korn � Mi er referred ouncil o th� anaing Comm ss on s recommenda- tton Q12-6-78b ofi approv�a� of the Specta7 Use P�rmbt conttngent upon: 1. No commercial use of the property. 2. Provision of a CertDfted Survey of the Bot identitytng the property Bine and @oaafion of the fence and gate opening. 3. Annua@ revPea for •I�wo years. 4. Public Safety Commitfiee's approva9 of parking between the fence and Lake Johanna BouOevard. Mtller �eported that #he requested fenCe deta@�s, Certtf9ed Survey, landscaping/off-street parking p�an.have not been re- celved; appdican4 ts not presen? tantght; appBEcation has been pending since Sepferaber 8978. 9n d9scussion, Councl0 expr�ssed cortcern re th• visuaB effect of the 4ence from �Fha sTree�, encroeehment on the sno+r storage . and off-s4reet parkiog area, mainteaance of the area batween fBRCB Bfld Si'P@@'F •'FC, Crichfon moved thafi Counctl deny the SpeciaG Use Permit, based on the informai�ion submttt�d, whtch does not solve the problem ofyacc�ss, vlsual appearancA fram Lake Johanns 69vd., the general deslgn detai@� of the fence and the� trRe�#c�Pc:+ �f #he b.�uleverd Ttself. Motioo __. . _ _ _ _ _T_-- - — -- . ��as .��4Aded �__Hanson and_c�ried unani�sL�L�_ N�u Bri hton Com rehenstve Plan �Ni 6er referred ounctl to his report 62/28/79) re hls over-vi�w of the New Brighton Compr�h�anstve POan; oo?ed thaf, basical9y, the pattern wlll be much as i4 is on tA� areas which interface rith Arden HIBIs. In discussTon, Council noted concern re dave9opments whtch may increase traffic through Arden HPi6s, expressed appreciatiort that area ea�t of 35Y1, south ofi Soo LTne RR is Tntended ta remain resldentiaY. -3-