Laserfiche WebLink
COUNCILMAN CRICHTON: I guess if we went ahead with this <br />proposal - doesn't this land lock your property? <br />MR. AMBLE: If you will give me an easement through this <br />• tax forfeited land so i can get to that end of it and I can use <br />this easement on the east end of it - it's a kind of a mickey- <br />mouse arrangement but I'll have to accept it, but I'd just as soon <br />not have a road go through it. <br />COUNCILMAN CRICHTON: You'11 still get three lots'out of it. <br />From my standpoint this would be too long a cul-de-sac. We need <br />another access. Apparently we can't qet out to Hamline and there <br />are some disadvantages to that so it appears if we want to <br />develop this plat of land we have to qet to Amble Road. This <br />one appears to be the most practical, but as an individual Council <br />member l don`t like the thought of taking land from an individual <br />who isn't ready to develop or plan or go in that direction, so I <br />have a dilemma and I don't know how to solve it. This appears to <br />be the only solution that makes any sense unless Mr. Amble has <br />another one that enables us to get through. <br />MR. EIBENSTEINER: As far as the property is concerned, <br />let`s say we put a barricade on the south side of the property <br />line - Mr. Amble qives the village an easement - 50 foot or <br />60 foot easement - we'd be inclined to go along with the idea. <br />�� We'll put in storm sewer, water and sanitary sewer, and put a <br />barricade on the south end of the property line. That way Mr. <br />Amble has no assessment on his property. His 150 foot lot is an <br />oversize lot - possibly it could be reduced to two 75-foot lots. <br />� That way he's not landlocked. His tax structure stays the same. <br />We pay for the utilities without the street. <br />MR. ChRISTOFFERSEN: You'd pay for the water and sewer to <br />your property and leave the street construction out just south <br />of Lots 14 and 1? <br />MR. EIBENSTEINER: I would guess if we had the sewer and <br />water we'd have the area pretty well built up a year from now <br />but if the market goes (inaudible) it would take three years, <br />and if there's too much traffic then the road would have to go <br />through and Mr. Amble be assessed. <br />COUNCILMP.N CRICHTON: But there are safety reasons there. <br />ACTING MAYOR WOODBURN: I'll ask for comments from the <br />� audience before turning it back to the Council. <br />COUNCILMAN HANSON: Mr. Amble mentioned a second easement. <br />Could we have that on the map? Is that off to the left? <br />MR. MILLER: It showed there is a partial right-of-way at the <br />far right. I think that's really mis-drawn, but there's some <br />type of access easement set aside there. It's not a public <br />easement. <br />15 <br />