Laserfiche WebLink
COUNCILA4AN WINGERT: That's a private easement and it's a <br />half street width so there would have to be an additional ease- <br />ment if that was to be considered a legitimate easement. The <br />other one is at the west, or about at the proposed road. <br />• N1R. CHRISTOFFERSEN: That would be right here. <br />COUNCILMAN WINGERT: It occurs to me we still wind up with <br />the same thing. We wind up kind of decidinq there's a road at <br />the point or that the�'s easements going through which probably <br />(inaudible) a£uture road, and I guess I'm persuaded to support <br />that position because I have none other to support. I think <br />it's very important there are too many (inaudible) too long to <br />serve with a single cul-de-sac road. I'm looking for a solution <br />(inaudible) If the easement on the east was a workable easement <br />as Mr. Miller showed us in alternative whatever it was, i think <br />I'd jump on that one - that being a better solution - but <br />I don't see one. So far in the testimony that I have heard <br />tonight there's no other suggestion that there's any other <br />solution to solve that particular problem, For lack of another, I <br />support this one and, therefore, I can't see the advantage of a <br />half ineasure of not putting a street in. We lose the advantage <br />of it and you still decided that's where it's going to go. <br />COUNCILMAN CRICHTON: Could this Council, and perhaps Mr. <br />" Popovich could tell us, if we go ahead with this one, at the assess- <br />ment hearing could the Council decide that the property through which <br />it goes - Mr. Amble's presently unplanned for development property - <br />should only be assessed at a future date and defer that portion of <br />, an assessment? <br />MR. POPOVICH: You could defer it, but we're just talking about <br />costs tonight, so at the assessment hearinq you could levy all the <br />assessments across the board as we normally have done, or that <br />portion on the Amble property you could defer until some future <br />time and then pick it up at that time if you wish to do it. We <br />have not deferred because of the bookkeeping involved in trying <br />to keep track of it, but legally you could. That decision could <br />be made at the assessment hearing. <br />MR. CHRISTOFFERSEN: May I make one statement. I think the <br />people (inaudible) you're alluding to another lot on this side. <br />Let me put the original drawing back on. I just wanted to point <br />out to the Council if this (inaudible} and assuming the property <br />line ran through here over to where that would be placed it's a <br />• deep piece of property and there's no sanitary sewer and watermain <br />and that would have to be brought in from this road because there <br />are two lots over there and that also would have to be planned <br />should Mr. Amble decide to develop that into more than one or two <br />lots. <br />COUNCILMAN CRICHTON: If we put that road throuqh we will <br />create two pieces of property for Mr. Amble. Could that assessment <br />at an assessment hearing time be deferred? I feel that we need <br />an outlet and I have heard no other alternative either. That's <br />why I have been searching for others for several months_and this <br />16 <br />