Laserfiche WebLink
4 <br />• <br />hiiiu�es of Regular Council �'eettng September 11, 197fl <br />Pa,7e four <br />nuinber of projections are windoa proJecttons only, not room pro- <br />jections; but�dlnp will be more in conformity with tfie Eioce�tric <br />buiiding on the stte. <br />Ytoodburn moved, seconded by Hanson, that Council approvo the window <br />r.han�t� as descrlbed. 1"otion carried. IWoodburn, Honson, Crepeau <br />vo;inv In favor of the motton; Crichton voting in, oppositton?. <br />[Crtchtan noted tha# his concern is that the 6uiiding is smailer <br />than requlrec by ordinance). <br />Case No. 78-23, Specfal Use Permit for D'ounds View Hiqh School <br />Caieteria anc Library Addition � <br />Planner t'iiler re�erred Council to his report of 8/31/78, reaardino <br />thej nroposed library/cafeteria addition to F'ounds View !-�igh School; <br />noted that the application is for a Specfal Use Permit for the <br />entlre h!ounds View Hiph School site to bring tt Ento conformity with <br />reyuirements of the Zonl�g Qrdinance (High School precedes adoption <br />of the current Zoning Ordlnance). MTller reported that the Planning <br />Commission recommends approval of the proposed additlon; occupancy <br />to be contingent upon anapproved landscape plan for the entire <br />Mounds Yfaw High School property. <br />Mr. �"ark Winsor (Haxbey, Blssa#{ 3�18i�, ArChi,a.r,ts) and Mounds <br />View 'rincipal Brungardt described the proposad addition to the <br />southeast sTde of tha existina "FI Shape" butldin� plan. The <br />exlsting geodestc structure is to be removed; chanqes are proposed <br />ovar a 5-yesr period to convert btounds View High School Yo a 4-year <br />program; foresees no pro�tem in providTnq a landscape plan for <br />approval prior to occupancy of the cafeteria/library addition (First <br />Phase). <br />After discussion, Crichton moved, seconded by Hanson, that Council <br />appro��e •rAe issuance of a Special Use Permit for the existin� <br />Mou;�ds View Hiah School slte� as buiit, includinq the c�Feteria/ <br />��brary addition (Phase I Construction) as presented wtth Case <br />Nc. 78-23 (plan dated received 8/16/78); occupancy of thb Phase I <br />addiiinr� to ba continosnt upon approval of landscape plan fior the <br />r�ntlre Mounds Vtc�w Hi�h School property. Motion carried unanimously. <br />Case �Vo. 78-25 Lot Split - Thomas weaver <br />�Ailler explained that the FTnal Plat of Weaver Oak Helahts <br />fs pending CouncTl approval, pendfng Cfty Enalneer's approval on <br />drainage. Developer does not inteod to record the piat at this time, <br />but has pern,issio� irom the oNners of the propMrfy to sef I the <br />westerly 108 feet of the property (Lot 3 as sho��n on the plat3. <br />Miller reported that the Planning f'ommission recommends approval <br />of the lot split, contin�ent upon approvai of the City Engineer and <br />Ctty Atturney. <br />:Vocdb�:rn moved, seconded by Crichton, that <br />, spltt requesterl, subject to approvai of the <br />Attor•�ey. MotTon carried unanimously. <br />Council approve the lot. <br />City Engineer and City <br />(Zoninq Adminlstrator noted that tt,e lot spltt �equested would <br />negat� the We.aver Oak Heights Plat pending tinal Council approval; <br />attorney To verify that no further action fs necessary). <br />County R��ad E Imaqe StudY <br />MiileT reported that he and the Plannfng Commisston are anxtous to <br />see the Couoty Road E Study Impiemented. <br />Coun�li concurred that the letter to the business community be <br />d-afted hy the+ City s+aff for Coun�i!'s consideration. <br />