Laserfiche WebLink
. <br />• <br />MONUTES OF REGULAR COUNCdL MEETiNG <br />Page Four <br />�uly !0, 1478 <br />Status Reaor# on Bussard Court Storm Drainaae Pro.iect <br />Chri�totfers�n reporte0 that the storm.drstnage project wili be <br />installed by the end of this week; Clem Houle ril) contract the <br />aork. <br />REPORT OF V9�LA6E PLANNER ORIYtd M9LLER <br />- T <br />Hestaurant <br />M iler rei�rred CouncFl to a site plan of the Town Crier Restau�a�t <br />properi-y at Red Fox Road and Lexington Avenue. indtcating the <br />focatton of the frash ertclosure on the east slde of the Duildir,g, <br />as approved under the Special Use Permit, and the proposed re- <br />location of the trash enclosure to the north edge of the property. <br />Miller described the p�oposed relocated enclosure to be 8' x 10' <br />x 6 f4. high ef wood-sided concrete block, with a ch'3in link gate <br />aith metaf slafs inserted; reported that th� Planning Commission <br />r�commends Council approv�l 04 relocation of �he enctosure; con- <br />sidered the new location to be afso acceptable ig iocated IO° <br />f�om fhe property Ilne with a return ca�rb and area between <br />stcucturo and properfy liae sodded. <br />Millsr explained fhat ths reasons given for tha relocation is <br />#o get the anclosure away from the bullding, and for better access <br />to th� enclosure For trucks; evldently pre�er So keep it where it <br />was during construcfiion. <br />After dtscussion, Hanson movedb seconded by CriChton, thafi Councii <br />deny the request �o relocate th� trash enclosure a� the Town <br />Crier restaurant, A4otion carried (Hanson, Crlchton. Grepeau , <br />vof(ng in tavcr ot the motion; Woodburn voting in opposdtion). <br />Code Enfaresmeot Officer was requested to se� that the trash <br />enclosure ts focatad according to the plan approved under the <br />Speclal Use Permit, Case No. 77-f4. <br />. <br />• <br />Cass No�77-4P.a KartA Lake Eststes - Lat SD1it and Consolidation <br />M—�er referrsd Counctl to Sketch of Proposed Lot Oivis3on af <br />Lof 44, 61ock i, Karth lake Estat�s; explafnad that, b�cause of <br />an error in siaking, Yhe hoase which is subsfiantial{y compiet� <br />encroaches o� a 5' dralnage easement e�d the 10' s3deyard of <br />lot 43,, Block io reported that the Planning Commission recommends <br />Counci� appro�aE af the loS split and consolidai�don'coniingent <br />upon the City,Engineer's approval of i��e sketch submltted. <br />Mr. Ernie Rud oxplained that if (s h4E errer; Building inspector <br />appraved house based on sfaking ahich was irscorrect; had stal[ad <br />tha oasfc house only; did not catch foottncas for deck; relocatlon <br />af dradnage sesea�nt a�d lot spiit and eonsolidation, as EnAlcat�d <br />on survepors sketch, wifl correc? tha arror; believe dratnage pipe <br />has shreeGy been relocated to !ot 44, as indieated. <br />After discussioo, Moodburn moved, seconded by Hanson, that Council <br />approvo 4he to9� split and conso{tdation as shown on Ske4ch da'i'ed <br />7-3-78, confingen�t upon approval of tha City Engtnser. Motlon <br />carried usssntrtiously. <br />Case No� 78-19, Sidevard Set6ack V�r�ance - 42usseli and Jean Bey <br />PAiIler r�ferrsd Counctl ta sketch o4 74= aide house proposed to <br />be lacatad on Lo? 2?, Block 30� Karth Lake Estates, which is 95� <br />wfde afi the bGflding line; expEained t�sat the re�u�st Is 4o center <br />the houss on ihe lot requlring a 4` sod� yerd vs�iance (25' total <br />side yarQ setbeck required). <br />P911ier raportbd tha# tAe Planning Commission recommenris dent.at <br />04 t�Se apql'sce?ton bscausa no hardshfp, relating to the iot, is <br />app�rent. <br />Criehton movec, seconded hy Woodburn, tha# Council deny the 4� <br />stdeya�-d rariznce requestad. Notion carrted unanimously. <br />- 4 - <br />