CC 06-19-1978 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

at the most and you have no storage at all. Excuse rae, you have storage, but it's very minimal, I7R, VAUGHN: i9e have a bit of a problem, The last time we were here on a discussion on the system approved a couple of • months ago we cited all of our arguments and you're familiar with them, and we have watero [ae feel it's something of a punishment - punitive, if you will - that we would be assessed. It looks to me like closer to $100,000 than $25,000 from my rough look at it, Again, the property on the 45 vacant acres that Mr, Ostrem was referring to would be somewhat the same, That represents a substantial portion of the acreage that°s covered by this water proposal, and you talk about the number of people owning property, but you nust talk also about the number of acres of property that the assessments will bear and it looks like that represents a substantial portion of the assess�nts, and I can only go on record as being opposed to the water system for that reason, It doesn't provide any bene- fit for the people in the area north of Highway 96. The assessments to us across fiighway 96 would be of no benefit to us whatsoever and the people who are benefitting from it would be the people who are developing com�rcial property on the west side of Round Lake which might well be to their benefit, and if it is, the assessments should be paid by that benefittiny property. If it has to be that the water goes around to the west side of Round Lake, we would recommend that a dead-end on the north side of Round Lake thereby not causing an exces- sive burden on us so far as assessments, taxes, interest are concerned. COUNCILP9AN La00DBURN: R9y figures agree with your fiqurese MR, JOSEPH BUSSARD, 4335 Highway l0a I oam the piece of property on the southeast corner of the lake there and in the process of developing it, probably have about 40 lots or a few more and if I put in 40 wells there`s going to be a lot of wells without water, so I°m in favor of putting in the water and I know t�lr. 6��inneke is too because his property adjoins me on the south sideo • MR, EARL LETAIS, 1524 West Highway 96o Did I understanyd that you go on Snelling Avenue to 96? P•7AYOR CREPEAUe Would you point out that alternate7 MR. CHRISTOFFERSEN: The base plan i5 along 96 to Snelling and south on Snelling to the connection with the pro- posed watermain, FROM THE AUDIENCEa it would not include Lewise MR, CIiRISTOFFERSEN� Then Alternate 1 would include youe �