Laserfiche WebLink
Metadata
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015 Laserfiche. All rights reserved.
homes (inaudible) community well later on (inaudible) that cost <br />as compared to runninq pipe al1 over the place to service a <br />development on the west side of the lake. The second thing I <br />wonder about is the time relativity to 358 of a community <br />requestinq these kinds of hearings, as was mentioned before <br />• tinaudible) we thought we had it dead ahout a month or two <br />�nY1is ago. Is there anything in our laws which I don't seem <br />to be able to find that people can do this every week or month. <br />Are we going to keep coming back to meetings i£ Lakeshore ends <br />up omitted some way this time7. <br />PdR, POPOVICH: There's nothinq in the law on that point. <br />It's a matter of 35& of the people coming in with a petition. <br />The Council has to do something with the petition, and that <br />means hold a hearinq. It doesn't mean order the improvement. <br />It means hold a hearing, and people have been known to change <br />their mi.nds. If somethinq was turned down last February - we <br />got another improvement tonight> 2 don't know if it were turned <br />down tonight if another improvement would come in with 358, but <br />if 358 of the people file a petition the Council is required to <br />hold a hearing. They are not required to order it. It's up to <br />the people to fight it, and that's what the Council is.doing - <br />what they are required to do under the statute. <br />MR. BEGGIN: 9Jhere that (inaudible) my property and my <br />neighbors, we°xe opposed (inaudible) what kind of limitations <br />are there7 <br />MR. POPOVICFi: It's 35; of the affected property owners in <br />the proposed improvement, so whoever signs the petition and <br />circulates it, proposes an area and you have to have 35� of <br />what's improved. Obviously different people propose different <br />types of projects, but it's 35� of what's proposed. <br />MR. BEGGIN. That's in the name of the land owners? <br />MR> POPOVICII: It's land, <br />MR. BEGGIN: The other question - I asked the last time, <br />and I'm still interested in as I read more about the water <br />quality. What kind of water quality standards do we have in <br />Arden Hills or do we have proposed? <br />COUNCILMAN 6900DIIURN: Very stringent inspections monthly <br />for water quality. r4uch higher than a private system. In <br />fact, there is almost none for private systems, You find <br />• nitrates (inaudible) a great deal of material comes (inaudible) <br />private wells. I can tell you personally I didn't hook up in <br />the city system until my well went out, but there`s such a <br />difference in quality of water you �aouldn't believe it - at <br />least in my well, The smells I used to get in my shower at <br />least once a month for a few days are gone (inaudible). I <br />shouldn't say this, but the sanitary facilities which needed <br />� <br />