My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CC 06-19-1978
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
City Council
>
City Council Minutes
>
1970-1979
>
1978
>
CC 06-19-1978
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/24/2024 9:36:00 AM
Creation date
11/27/2006 10:26:07 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General (2)
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
41
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
COUNCILMAN CRICHTONa I guess 2 looked at it if it went <br />up there it would be a connection, <br />COUNCILI�.N HANSONe Commenting on the proposed motion, i <br />• have two reservations. Having been on the Planning Commission <br />when Arden I�lanor was expanded, I can reca11 A3r. Adams asking us <br />at that time - I assume the Council concurred - we did not <br />foresee when we could supply water to that part of the city, <br />and as a result, Mr, Adams started his own water well system so <br />I feel somewhat of an obligation to not impose water on Arden <br />t3anor under those circumstances unless absolutely necessarye If <br />Stewart Lumber was requesting at this time, I would probab2y <br />lean toward supplying them an@ imposing on the peo�le in between, <br />but that's not the case, Secondly, i find myself, as an engi- <br />neer, almost embarrassed and compromised and very uncomfortable <br />about not doing a job that is obviously a complete and final <br />plan, but I do value the position oP all these residents and <br />even the developers that are not ready to pay the bill. I feel <br />that the compZete plan - that is, the basic plan - will foroe <br />some people to sell and force some people to develop �re <br />rapidly than they are comfortable with, so I'm not in favor o£ <br />the motion and will state at this time that in the alternative <br />I feel comfortable, qr semi-comfortable -(inaudible) is to <br />provide the industrial part of Round Lake with tinaudible) some- <br />thinq less than a complete loop system which in my own mind <br />probably would require some modification of the plan - maybe a <br />complete 12-inch line up to the end of the industrial property <br />there in order to make sure there was enough flow (inaudible) <br />from one direction to give them adequate pressure for normal <br />usage, It°s probably somewhat incomplete in that I do tkrink <br />the Dorothy McClunq property ouqht to be serviced at this time. <br />I'm not sure about George Reiling. I understand he has asked <br />at this time so we could work somethinq out in that area and <br />not involve a cot�lete looping system and pzovide water over <br />there. I imagine Mr. Susnik would be forced to share some oE <br />that assessment because it would affect some o€ his property. <br />MAYOR CREPEAtJ: The firat four lots east of Snelling AVenue <br />abuttinq on Highway 96 asked for water. <br />NiR, GiiRISTOFFERSSNc Includinq this one, this one, and <br />this one, the way i understand. <br />COWiCILMAN HANSON; That's Reilinq plus three lots, <br />I�1R> CHRISTOFFERSENa Reiling has this piece heree <br />. CO[INCILMAN HP,AISOL�: And the next one is S4r, King and he's <br />vocally negativee <br />FROt•S THE AUDIENCE; If you go farther east, that°s mine. <br />1t9AY0R CREPEAUa 7'hen it's Y9r. Lawyer and those two are <br />opposed, <br />33 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.