CC 06-19-1978 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

} If you go to the Alternate 1 plan, which is Snelling to Hamline, you will have to add $48,6�Oe That raises the cost to $539,200. It would he $16.52 a front foot for residential, and commercial would be raised to $20.52. The acreage and service • charge remain the same. We wi11 reoeive a total of $460,686 from assess�nts and will have to levy $78,514, or 510,000 more on general taxes. The Alternate 2 plan which includes Snelling to Pemtom is a 520,300 addition to the base plan for a total of $510,900. The residential front footage drops to $15e45 a foot, the com- mercial to $19.45 a foot, and the aoreage charge and the service charge remain the saiae. On Alternate 2 the assessments raise $440,260 and we will have to raise $70,640 by general taxes for the total of $510,900. On the Alternate 3 plan, that total cost is $732,000< The residential cost goes up to $i8e94 a foot, the commercial to $22.94, and the acreage and service charges remain the sameo Under this plan $603,217 would be raiaed from assess�nts, and $128,783 by general taxes, for a total of 5732,000. Depending on the hearing and what develops from the hearing and what the Council orders, the total cost will then comz out. 67e propose that the assessments be spread over a 20 year period of time with an 8� carzying charge, with the right of prepayment as has been our past practice, and we will be available to answer any questions. MAYOR CREPEAU: The Council is charged with the responsi- bility of determining whether the improvement is feasible and should be constructed in the manner as presentad, and we would like to hear from th� people in the audience in favor of the improvement, and �vill each of you come to this microphone and give your name and address and your reasons for favoring the improvement. We have a court reporter here and it's on tape and this is in accordance with law. Anyone who caould like to address the Council or the sudience who is for the project? Next, those who oppose the irnprovement, do the same thing - aome to the mi.crophone, give your name and address and reasons for your opposition. MR. E'RA�ICIS HUSNIK, owner of Arden Manor (Mobile Some Court) and also owner of an approximate 45 acre tract south of Highway 96 and east of Highway 10: Involved in the biggest part of this area which we have got the - I guess I came in . late and I'm sorry. T don't know exaCtly where - I guess I'm misled by the red lines. The way I thouqht - it was a loop. The way I read the thing - the Notice of the Heaxing was the water line urould coa� up on down there - follow - the way it indicated it would follow 35-W up to where 35-W intersects up that way. It doesn't go that way. 3