CC 05-08-1978 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

�er:ut�s oi R�guiar t'.a_E�ci: Me�ting May 8, l97S � Pac;e 3. Wfegert moved, secondad by Hansan, 'that Counci! approve the i7' front setba�ic variance fior �he easferiy sign on fhe jroperty. Hanson moved fio ame��d the motion ia incPude approvai ot the 2° ground clear- ance va;iances, permi#fing the two "grbund �igns". Amendment was noi acc�sp�ed Gy �dingert. Atii�er furfiher dtscussion, CroCh-ton mov�c to amend th� motiort to add "as long �a •'rhere are �xisting mature'trees on the site necessitating the- setback �rariance." Rm2�ndment v�as accepted by Wingert and Hanspn snci motion, as amended, cerr3ed unanimously. Woadburn r±�avad that Counci f xalve 4he ?�ro foot qround clear�nCe requtr��nertt �or 'the tevo signs. PRn�hion was seconded by Henson and • cae•ried (Fdoodburn, Hanson, Crithton, Crepeau �oti�g in favor of the moi'ion; SVrngert v��Ying in op�csifio�). Casa No. 78�82, Lo�- Splif and Cansoiidation - Reggy Jensen Miiler reterred Cou�ci! to ske.fches attached to his report of 4-25-78; explainad th�t th� applicart �Sroposes to�spfit 50 feat from the east edge of he�r iot atid consolidate the 50 400t sir3R with the fot #o fihe east; proposed lot line'w.il# bisecfi an existipg diiapida4ed storage shed; Plaiiaing Commissian recommenQs approvai of the spitt , and c�nso!idation cantingent upon removal of the si�orage building. Miller r�xpleined �hat tha fwo lots witl confcrm with ali area and dimenst�n requtremen�Fs of 4rdinance 99, end the property transfer wi;! rssulfi 3n fots being ot similar siae. . Wirgert moved, se�onded by Woodburn, th�at Go�ancil ap�rove the lot sp(it and consolidation, siabjec�� to remova! of the s�ed. Motion cae�r'ssd unanimousiy. Case No. 78-fi� Re-subdfvi5lon - A..1. H�imbach Miller �axplained that #he �3pplicant proposes to re-subdivlde Lot Bic�ck 8, �sosept�ina Hii!s Ptet No. 2 fnto six {6d si�9aie-family re_=.idenFi��i lofs ,t4 f�-ont�ng nn Tl fl�r Lane and 1•�vo fronting on Hamlina AvenueP; nofed fl�ai' fhe property is designated as being fhe 1°fi�o�i fringe" on the Praiiminary Flood Hazard and Boundary 4eiigibie fior cerfaln fiPE and d�veiopment). 4, ln Map Councli aas reterrad to Ciiy �'ng!neeres reporfi of 4-27-78, and attaChmen7s and tu Ptanner Miliar°s rep�rt of 3-30-78. Miller report�d �thaP #he Pianning Con2rt;ission recommends Counci! deniat af thA re••subdivl�fon because lfi has not be�n st�oan that the pro- posed davQBopmertt �ai19. no? adueFsely impact the arAa drainage. A4fer discussion, Wingert movsd, sacondEd by Woodburn, that Cawncii 6eny th�a t'redimtnary Ptaf of tha� proposed subdivislon on the basis fhc:f it does not adequate3y provid� a sc+i�tipn to th� local dratnage pa�obiem. Mo•{-fon carrled unesnimousEy. Atter� fur�he� dlscuss3on, 6�aodburn moved, seconded by Hanson, ihat C4une11 aufh��Ize #he Citv Engineer 40 loak 6n�o tfne drae�age sit- uafilon i� f�is arm� and aEscuss and fiind oui- thm f+3asibility o� dtvertit�g some of $he drair;ag� t� �vert tFas floodi�g that occurs dn this,a�ea, dn d(scussfan it �as nofied fih�� ;lccding of th� r�r�a Is apparent; neod -ho fi"snd out wtiy thare is �laoc�ing and aehai shouid be done about ii-,- shoufci d�termine sahat storac�e capabiliti�as stsoul� remain fio take care of a.rry ioca! dra'snage e��.; benettttad proportl�s may hdvE to assurne thc� financial re3pcarsibili�y io etfect a sclution, once it has i�ee�s� G�i-ernined ho�v th� � foodtnq probi@m c�� 3e correctEd. f�oi•ion carrisd unani!nousfy. , 7 ftice Fark - Lot S�iit and Pre- Miiler �x�ia`sned fitoat fhe parce4 preposEd i-o b� plafted into three t33 lots i;ls�cington W.�ods 4ftice3 Parkl !s th� wes'�sr�i porT6on c�f a• 5- ac�e firac•t a4 the ;iorths�esi ccrner oF Lexinqton A-renue and Co��nty '.Road F; noi^ed tha7 fh� primary cencErns cf th�a Pla�ning Commission wsre: i. p�teni3al usH o�t fhe remaindar of the parcel wEiich would _ ,3 _