My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CC 02-06-1978
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
City Council
>
City Council Minutes
>
1970-1979
>
1978
>
CC 02-06-1978
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/24/2024 9:35:06 AM
Creation date
11/27/2006 10:26:16 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General (2)
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
43
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
� <br />�`� (inaudible). I'd want to talk to the engineer and talk to an <br />appraiser, but at this point we're getting adverse and I was <br />hoping the matter didn't get into an adversary situation because <br />we are, and I trust, up until this point, have been in a more <br />cooperative bent rather than an adversary bent." <br />MR. FLAI�RTY: "2 don't think we're in an adversary posture <br />yet." <br />MR. POPOVICH: "But I have to determine whether it might <br />end up that way." <br />. . . . . Reporter changing tape . . . . . <br />• <br />MR. POPOVICH: "Would you get opposition from other quarters. <br />Those are the things that come into play, They all got notices, <br />Theoretically, the theory of the law is, they got notices. The <br />mere fact that people don't come would at least indicate from <br />whatever inquiry they made, due process has been satisfied. <br />Supposing I was a property owner across the street and I called <br />and asked what is the cost of the project. How many dollars <br />would Flaherty pay and what do I pay, and so I say that's fair <br />enough, I won't come. But if it's $10,000 more than you told <br />me - you've reduced his and increased mine, and I don't want <br />to get in that position, much as I can sympathi2e with what <br />he wants to do. I've seen ten property owners where there was <br />a 100� assessment - where they have aqreed to what the percentage <br />would be and they've done it by unit charge and forgotten about <br />the frontage and acreage and said we'll each pay one-tenth, so <br />no matter what the cost came out later you have had that tenta- <br />tive agreement between them that they won't be objecting, but to <br />do it with one and not the other people does raise some problem <br />if you're qoing to reduce it unless you say we will not change <br />the others, but we will reduce yours. Hut only you can make <br />that decision," <br />MR. FLAHERTY: "Don, I was looking at the study you gave <br />the Council on January 16. I don't believe in that study you <br />really address yourself specifically to how you're going to <br />assess it, and apparently there was a paragraph that the Buetow <br />people took up from and assumed that perhaps as far as a gutter <br />and street are concerned you would do it on a front footage basis, <br />and the storm sewer would be on an acreage basis." <br />� <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.