My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CC 02-06-1978
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
City Council
>
City Council Minutes
>
1970-1979
>
1978
>
CC 02-06-1978
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/24/2024 9:35:06 AM
Creation date
11/27/2006 10:26:16 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General (2)
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
43
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
� <br />� MAYOR CREPEAU: <br />improvement - anyone <br />take the microphone <br />record, because this <br />MR. POPOVICH: <br />� <br />� <br />� <br />� <br />"if there are any questions concerainq the <br />like to ask a question or make a statement, <br />and qive us your name and address for the <br />is a public hearing." <br />"Do we have any correspondence for or against?" <br />I�IItS. MC NIESH: "I believe there was a letter at the last <br />Council meeting from the architect for Flaherty's." <br />COUNCILMAN CRICHTONs ��That was with some suggeated ap- <br />praaches." <br />MRS. MC L�'lESH: "Toward assessments." <br />COUNCILMAN CRICFPPON: "I have one question for the engineer. <br />Your letter to us indicated that the cost estimate did not in- <br />clude the cost of digging the detention basin or the storm lines <br />in parking lot C. We assume that �.*ould be paid by the developer. <br />Is the developer in accordance with that assumption7" <br />MR. CHRiSTOFFERSEN: "We have discussed thfs matter with <br />the developer, and they have agreed to make that part of the <br />construction." <br />MR. PAT FLAF�RTY: "I don't have much to add. The letter <br />I passed out at the last meeting addressed itself to three <br />thoughts. One was the matter of assessment. On an informal <br />basis this matter was discuased last week, and at that time <br />the figures you qave were made known to the people at Buetow <br />Associates, and 2'd asked them to check into it and they had <br />written me a letter and that letter was then pasaed out to <br />the folks that were preaent last time. I don't know if you <br />want to put that in your record or not, but the thrust of <br />the letter was the manner of the assessment - to try to get <br />it treated as equally as possible." <br />"The second item was to see if it weren't possible to <br />use the existing street to the extent possible. The third <br />item was - because of the nature of the development - we <br />seemed - at least the people we had engaged to look the <br />situation over for us - to see if perhaps there couldn't be <br />some contribution toward that from village funds or from <br />3 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.