Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> ARDEN HILLS PLANNING COMMISSION - FEBRUARY 2, 2005 6 <br /> 48 fcct from the edge of the road and on the south end, they werc also still over 48 feet <br />. from the road. He indicated this was a uniquc neighborhood and the houses were <br /> scattercd all ovcr thcir lots because of the topography. He stated therc wcrc a number of <br /> homcs in the neighborhood that had sctback issucs and havc had to request variances. Hc <br /> stated this was a uniquc ncighborhood and they did not want to destroy any of that <br /> Ul1lqueness. He pointed out that their home was getting old and necdcd to be updated. <br /> He indicatcd thcre wcre vmious homes in the neighborhood that had requested variances <br /> to update their homes. Hc stat cd he believed thcy were kccping with the character of the <br /> ncighborhood and this was the best option duc to the unique lot thcy had. <br /> Commissioner Thompson stated she had looked at thc lot and shc agreed thcre was a <br /> deep cmbankmcnt. She asked if they had considered expanding out to thc east. Mr. <br /> Thornton rcplied thc problcm thcre was with thc walkout, which would make two floors <br /> and they did not want that largc of an expansion. Hc stated thcrc would also not be a <br /> good way to move the kitchcn back there. <br /> Mr. Thornton stated they had spoken with their neighbors who had signcd a petition <br /> indicating they had no objection to this projcct. He understood there was one objcction <br /> that had comc in and thcy had not spoken to that pcrson. lIe indicated all of the <br /> neighbors he had spoken to had seen all of the documents and were in support of this <br /> project. <br /> Commissioner Thompson asked how many trees they would have to cut down for this <br />. project. Mr. Thornton replicd therc were no trees that would need to be removed. <br /> Chair Sand notcd the back of his property was heavily wooded and askcd if thcy <br /> expanded out the back, would they have to remove trees. Mr. Thornton responded he <br /> was not sure, but he would be concerned about the root system of the oak trces. <br /> By Email, Zata Vickcrs: "1 live at 3470 Siems Ct., the fIrst housc on Siems Ct across <br /> Ardcn Place from 2510 Siems Ct. I don't expect to be able to attcnd the hearing on <br /> February 2, so am e-mailing opinion and comment to you. <br /> I am opposed to this request bccause this construction will altcr the character of the <br /> ncighborhood. <br /> I enjoy the park-like quality of Siems Ct. Many trees, lawns, and other plants providcd <br /> the lovely and peaceful character of this neighborhood. Houses, no mattcr how <br /> architccturally gorgeous, do not give thc same feeling. <br /> I am constantly rcminded of this from the vicw through my backyard windows that used <br /> to look out on an expanse of grass and trees and now look out on a very large concrete <br /> block and a baby-poop-yellow house. It is a constant reminder to many of us that the <br /> character of a neighborhood can so easily he blighted by someone elsc's pride and joy. <br /> That housc is within its lcgal limits. Howcver it has motivated mc to work against <br />. similar situations, such as the variance requcst for 3510 Sicms, wherc we have sctback <br /> rcgulations specifically to prcvent such changcs in character. <br /> The Thornton's house already appears to bc much closer to thc road than the other houses <br /> on the same side of that street. Extending it cven closcr to thc road would furthcr <br />