Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> - <br /> ARDEN HILLS PLANNING COMMISSION - FEBRUARY 2, 2005 9 <br /> By Email, Bob May, 1871 Todd Drive: "Unfortunately 1 will be unable to attend thc <br />. hcaring tonight on project pc#05-04 but wish to make known my conccrns. If a service <br /> station/conveniencc store/car wash is built at the location indicated on the map, it will bc <br /> dircctly across highway 96 from my homc in Arden Manor Mobilc Home Park. I am <br /> vcry concerned about the lights and noise eminating (sic) from such a business. Is there <br /> any discussion to erect a sound barrier on the north side of highway 96 tram 1-35W to <br /> highway 10 (or at least to thc entrance into Arden Manor)? Also, would access to the <br /> facility be directly from highway 96 or from Round Lake Blvd., which would then funnel <br /> onto highway 96 at the traffic light? Thank y(~u for giving mc the opportunity to express <br /> my thoughts" <br /> Dave McClung, 4370 North Snclling Avcnue, stated he lived in thc northcrn part of town <br /> and he was supportivc of this proposal. He stated in this stretch of Highway 35, you went <br /> a long stretch to get to a gas station. He indicated he supported businesses within Arden <br /> Hills and they did not havc anything likc this in the north part of thc City. He believed <br /> this proposed development would be very nice and would be an advantage to the <br /> community. <br /> Chair Sand elosed the public hearing at 8:27 p.m. <br /> Commissioner Zimmerman asked if the access would bc ofT Round Lakc Boulevard <br /> versus going ofT of Highway 96. Mr. Hellegers replied therc would probably be one <br /> right-in, right-out on Round Lake Boulevard. with a fuller access farther down on Round <br />. Lake Boulevard. but therc would be no access onto Highway 96. <br /> Commissioner Zimmennan cxpressed concern about the hcight of the signs. Mr. <br /> Hellegers noted anything that exceeded the current sign standards would nced to approval <br /> by the Planning Commission as well as a Special Use Permit. Hc stated he would like to <br /> see a monumcnt typc of a sign and not a largc pylon sign. <br /> Chair Sand agreed stafT necdcd to make thc developer aware that the Planning <br /> Commission wanted a quality dcvelopment on this sitc and would be ent<.1fcing the <br /> buildings standards in that arca. <br /> Commissioner Zimmerman movcd, seconded by Commissioner Larson to approve <br /> Planning Case No. 05-04: Arden Hills; Zoning Ordinance Amcndment to Gatcway <br /> Business District, rcvisions for Automobile Scrvice Stations with Retail and a Car Wash <br /> as a Special Use including amcndments 1 through 6. <br /> Thc motion carried unanimously (6-0). <br /> UNFINISHED AND NEW BUSINESS <br /> A. TCAAP Preliminarv Framework Plan <br />. Mr. Clark statcd statf was seeking action on the Twin Cities Army Ammunition Plant <br /> (TCAAP) Master Framework Plan dated January 13,2005. <br /> He notcd the TC AAP Master Framework Plan. which is substantially the same as the <br /> Plan revicwed by the Planning Commission on December 8. 2004, was developed <br />