Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> 'ARDEN HILLS PLANNING COMMISSION - MARCH 2, 2005 8 <br /> the land should include an "'if visiblc" clause to regulatc the signage. Thc signs that are <br />. not visiblc would not bc subject to thc rcgulation; those that are would have to comply <br /> with the new size standards and would bc requircd to file sign pemlit applications as <br /> describcd in the ordinance. In addition, mcmbers of the Planning Commission <br /> recommcnded that the "if visible" clausc should cstablish who was detcrmining if the <br /> signagc was visiblc. Staff has included language that would ultimately give that authority <br /> to the City Councilor City Administrator. <br /> He recommendcd approval of the seven Sign Ordinance Amcndments as proposcd. <br /> Commissioncr Larson recommended thcy designate a ccrtain staff membcr or designcc to <br /> look into the signage. He noted as it was worded that City Councilor City Administrator <br /> shall detcrminc if the signage is visible was poor wording tor an Ordinance. <br /> Chair Sand opcned the public hearing at 8:30 p.m. <br /> Chair Sand invitcd anyone tor or against thc variance to come forward and make <br /> commcnt. <br /> Bruce Kunkel, 3452 Glen Arden Road and Administrator at Bethel Collcge, thankcd statT <br /> and thc Commission for their work on this. He believed this would work well for both <br /> Bethel Collegc and the rcsidents. <br />. Chair Sand closed the public hearing at 8:31 p.m. <br /> Commissioncr Larson moved, seconded by Commissioncr Bczdicek to approve Planning <br /> Case No. 05-08 : City of Arden Hills, 1145 W. Highway 96; Sign Ordinance <br /> Amcndmcnts t()r Athletic Field Signage at Bethel University, Northwcstern Collegc, and <br /> Mounds View High School. <br /> The motion carricd unanimously (5-0). <br /> D. PLANNING CASE 05-07: CITY OF ARDEN HILLS. 1245 \V. HIGHWAY 96. <br /> ZONING ORDINANCE AMENDMENTS FOR 10- FOOT FRONT PORCH <br /> EXCEPTION TO FRONT SETBACK IN R-l AND R-2 ZONING DISTRICTS <br /> Mr. Hellegers requested the Commission consider staffs recommendation to amend <br /> Section 6.C.2.a. of the Zoning Ordinance and insert new section 6.C.2.d into thc Zoning <br /> Ordinance. <br /> He recommended approval of Zoning Amendmcnts #1 and #2 to allow tor stcps, decks, <br /> and ramps as Permittcd Encroachmcnts up to 6 feet in all Zoning Districts and to allow <br /> Front Porches as Pcrmittcd Encroachmcnts of up to 10 feet, providcd that the front porch <br /> is no closer than 30 feet from any front or side lot linc, ft)r Single-Family Dwellings. <br />. Chair Sand asked what tt)!. thc definition of residcntial street sidc yard. Mr. Hcllcgcrs <br /> replied that would be a comer propcrty. <br /> Chair Sand asked if they wanted to allow somc flexibility in the footing and ttHJI1dation <br /> materials so it was complimcntary to the home. I Ie expressed concern that it might be <br />