2005 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

.. ARDEN HILLS PLANNING COMMISSION - NOVEMBER 2,2005 2 UNFINISHED AND NEW BUSINESS . A. Plannin2: Case 05-19: Brvson Woods. 1978 Thorn Drive - Final Plat Mr. Johnson stated Richard Kotoski and Kim Bryson d/b/a Bryson Woods have submitted the Final Plat for the subdivision of the property at 1978 Thom Drive. The property, originally platted as Lot #20 under the Rholdeder's Home and Garden Acres Plat of 1938, would be subdivided into three single-family lots. All of the property lots comply with the minimum lot areas for the R-2: Single and Two Family Residential Zoning District. Mr. Johnson reviewed the Final Plat and recommended approwal aft~r making a finding that the proposed plat is consistent with previous approvals ,for tile Preliminary Plat and is subject to the following conditions: " '1 p , 0U? A. Recording at Ramsey County. The develoR~r sh~n file the~i~al Plat with the Ramsey County Recorder and provide the City with a recorde'dcopy. B. Compliance with City Code. The developer shall comply with the applicable provisions of the City Code and related ordinances.," ",' , ~Jf1ib\+ ~0' C. Park Dedication. The ~eveloi!r s~la~11~~~nto ~ Pu~lic Use Dedication Fee Payment Agreement prIor to tIle CIty'sr~leaseofi~he FlIlal Plat. . D. Development Agreell1_ The d~veloper ~l~'~l enter into a Development Agreement with the City, which lliust be executed prior to the release of the Final Plat. , , '" .~.>>>: E.R'emO.M,<tW,tructuresf4\0;;jG,he developer is required to remove the existing st~'uctures P~~1:J9~thc CitY'~,lease of the Final Plat, unles~ a. surety is posted WIth the CIty to ensure removal of these structures w\thlll a reasonable " ' timeframe. I' 'F G d' d D . The grading and drainage plan must be revised in '. ra lIlg an rainage. , ,ccordance wi~,lphe recommendations of the City Engineer. Commissiol1er 4p;Ts98stated on Lot 1 at the last meeting, they had requested the house being proposed'~e'no variances. He asked if this was what the proposal was. Mr. Richard Kotoski; applicant, respond cd the south boundary was considered the back of the lot and the house shown would fit within the setbacks and no variances would be requested. Commissioner McClung asked if the existing structure could be removed as a pm1 of the conditions of approval. Mr. Kotoski responded they would prefer it not being required to be removed prior to the building pemlits being issued. . Chair Sand asked when they would be starting construction. Mr. Kotoski responded they wanted to start this fall so they had a model up by spring, 2006.