Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> Resident Comment <br /> . Staff has not received any letters or telephone calls from adjacent property owncrs or occupants <br /> in rcgard to this planning case. The applicant did submit a new petition from adjacent propel1y <br /> owncrs in favor of the rcvised variance. <br /> J[)eadlinc for A1?;cncY A.ctions <br /> Thc City of Ardcn Hills received the completed application for this request on November 20, <br /> 2006. Pursuant to Minnesota State Statute, the City must act on this rcquest by January 20,2006 <br /> (()() uays), unless the City providcs the petitioner with written rcasons for an additional 60 day <br /> rcyicvv pcriod, The City may with thc petitioners' consent cxtcnd the review period beyond the <br /> IlO da\-'5. <br /> Since this application will not go to the City COllncil until their January 29,2007, meeting, the <br /> City will inli.mn the applicants that the revicw period will go bcyond the initial sixty day review <br /> period. <br /> Attachments <br /> 3A-l Application and sllpporting materials fi'om the applicant <br /> 3/\-2 Air Photo and photographs of the site <br /> . 3A-3 Buildable Area and Survey <br /> -. <br /> Ci(r (~f..1 rcll'lI lIills <br /> . i-'1<llIlIill,!!. Commissioll Ah','fillgjil!" jalll/afT !O, 'lOO7 <br /> "..tic-1m, i'Ii'I,lI,,"mil'llhill.0l'fallllil/g Pfalll/ill.!!, ('as,',' :~(I(i(>:I)6-()35 1111."('11 Varilllli'" (l'l0VI)I.YCi'l ~~O()6 -pc R"I'()rl - Ilul'clI f.'ariaM',>,doc <br /> Page 9 of 9 <br />