Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> . <br /> regulations would limit accessory structure hcight to 15 feet or no taller than the . <br /> principal structure, whichever is shorter. This height allows property owncrs to <br /> sti II have storage above, but it would limit building a full second story on new <br /> accessory structures. Common height limitations in other cities arc between 13 <br /> and 25 feet. <br /> I'Ieight is measured from the average level of the gradc along the foundation to the <br /> halfway point between the tallest peak and eavcs. The regulations in the <br /> accessory structurc section do not affect attached garages. <br /> . Membrane Structures: Earlier this year, the City revised the accessory structure <br /> rcgulations to ban membranc structures. This ban unintentionally banned all <br /> tcmporary tents and other structures that are used for family reunions, picnics, <br /> greenhouses, etc. Thc intent of the ban was to stop the use of tent structures used <br /> for garagcs in rcsidential areas; howevcr, thc ban overreached its initial goal. <br /> The revised regulation would permit pennanent membranc structures in non- <br /> residential areas subject to the site plan revicw process. Temporary membrane <br /> structures would bc pemlittcd in non-residential areas for up to six months with <br /> an approved building permit, which is primarily meant to address greenhouses in <br /> the commercial zones. Finally, temporary membranc structures would bc allowed <br /> for up to two days in any zone without a pcmlit. The two day excmpt membrane <br /> structures would covcr the family reunion tents, picnic tents, and similar types of . <br /> tents. Pel1nanent mcmbrane structures in residential arcas would still not be <br /> pcrmitted. <br /> . Site Plan Review, CUlTcntIy, to deviate from the accessory structure standards, <br /> propcrty owncrs arc required to go through the variance process. For the most <br /> part. it is very difficult to provc a hardship to grant a variance for an accessory <br /> structure, even if the proposal were lcgitimatc. Another option is to have <br /> deviations from thc accessory structure regulations bc dealt with through the site <br /> plan revicw proccss, which docs not utilize thc hardship critcria but still gives thc <br /> City discrction to approvc or deny such applications. Under the proposal, a <br /> variancc would still be required to exceed thc total accessory structure square <br /> footage pcrmittcd for a residential property, <br /> Clear Vision Arca, The current zoning regulations provide two separate definitions (or <br /> the clcar vision arca at intersections. The clear vision area is used to make sure that <br /> fencing, landscaping, and signs do not intcrfere with traffic or pedestrian safety. To be <br /> consistent, Staff is proposing to eliminate both definitions and use the clear vision area <br /> definition adopted in the Sign Code. The references to the clear definition area in <br /> Sections 1325.03 Subd 2.C and 1325.05 Subd 4.K will refer to the new clear definition <br /> area, which is described in full in the definitions section (Section 1305.04 Subd 30). The <br /> i',-\1('rro,inel./I.\';ard,-'nlull.l PlmIllill'!!"!'llIn/lill,l!. ClIses'!IJ06\06.034 Zonin,l!. Code RccodijiratlOlI WEN/lINGjIII0706 . CC Memo, Loning . <br /> !<",:odificlIrio/l,d,,(' <br /> Page 6 of)3 <br />