Laserfiche WebLink
<br />. In establishing the portion to be dedicated or preserved or the cash fee, the City shall give <br />due consideration to the open space, recreational, or common areas and facilities open to <br />the public that the applicant proposes to reserve for the subdivision. <br />. The municipality must reasonably determine that it will need to acquire that portion of <br />land for the purposes stated in this subdivision as a result of approval of the subdivision. <br />. The municipality must not deny the approval of a subdivision based solely on an <br />inadequate supply of parks, open spaces, trails, or recreational facilities within the <br />municipality. <br />. There must be an essential nexus between the fees or dedication <br />and the municipal purpose sought to be achieved by the fee or dedication. The fee or <br />dedication must bear a rough proportionality to the need created by the proposed <br />subdivision or development. <br />. If a municipality is given written notice of a dispute over a proposed fee in lieu of <br />dedication before the municipality's final decision on an application, a municipality must <br />not condition the approval of any proposed subdivision or development on an agreement <br />to waive the right to challenge the validity of a fee in lieu of dedication. <br /> <br /> <br />The italicized bullet points are particularly important because they summarize the overall theme <br />in State Statutes for setting the park dedication fee. Essentially, the park dedication fee must be <br />reasonable and proportional to the impact of the subdivision on the park system. Based on the <br />park dedication fees applied to other recently approved subdivisions, the City Attorney has <br />expressed some concern regarding the potential for applying inequitable park dedication fees. <br />Park dedication fees should be comparable between subdivisions that are reviewed and approved <br />in substantially the same timeframe. It would be difficult for the City to demonstrate that new <br />lots in one subdivision have a greater impact on the park system than new lots in another <br />subdivision, particularly when the subdivision is reviewed and approved within the same <br />timeframe. The fee can be adjusted over time to account for overall increases in land value. <br /> <br />Since 2005, the following park dedication fees have been applied to new subdivisions: <br /> <br /> <br />Status Plannin Case Park Dedication Fee New Lots Fee er Lot <br /> 05-019 $15,600 3 $5,200 <br />Approved 06-002 $4,808 <br /> 06-004' $4,896 <br /> 06-001 $7,594 2 <br /> <br />A roved & Pendin Avera e <br />*Reduced from maximum park dedication fee <br /> <br />The City Attorney and I have discussed the option of using a running average of past park <br />dedication fees, including the potential maximum fee of the final plates) under review, to <br /> <br />\\Metro-inet.us\ardenhillslPlanninglP/anning Cases\2006\06-038 Amities Coast - Burroughs Lane Final Plat (PENDING)\031207 _ CC Report- <br />Burroughs Lane (amities coast) Final Plat. doc <br />Page 3 of5 <br />