Laserfiche WebLink
<br />ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL - MARCH 26, 2007 <br /> <br />4 <br /> <br />Mr. Johnson stated the City last conducted a community survey in 1990. Because of the <br />changes in the community since 1990, $10,500 was included in the 2007 budget for conducting a <br />community survey. The intent of the community survey is to evaluate existing City programs, <br />services, and quality of life issues that have an impact on the residents of Arden Hills and to <br />receive input on possible new services, projects, TCAAP, or other items of interest to the City <br />Council. <br /> <br /> <br />Councilmember Holden noted 50 questions were a lot of questions to be doing on the phone. <br />Ms. Wolfe noted it was up to 50 questions and they could do less. <br /> <br />Councilmember Holden asked if the City of New Brighton had used this company and was it on <br />their last survey. Mr. Johnson responded they had, but he was not sure ifthis company had been <br />used the last time they conducted a community survey. <br /> <br />Councilmember Grant noted this survey would be a different type of survey than they had done <br />previously. He believed there would be a more uniform, representative sample with this survey. <br /> <br />Councilmember Holmes stated she would be interested in which would be the best way to <br />conduct the survey (i.e., phone, mail, internet, etc.) She asked if there was any flexibility, or <br />were they set on a telephone survey of 50 questions or less. Mr. Johnson responded they prefer <br />the phone survey method as they had the most success with this method, but he could ask them if <br />they had other methods they could use. He stated he would check with Decision Resources as to <br />if there was any flexibility. <br /> <br />Councilmember McClung stated they needed to get a baseline they could use in the future and <br />they needed to be careful that the methodology was correct. He noted they did not only want <br />people who were very happy or very unhappy with the City and he believed the random phone <br />method was probably the best way to go and he would support it. <br /> <br />MOTION: Councilmember Grant moved and Councilmember McClung seconded a <br />motion to approve awarding the Community Survey contract to Decision <br />Resources in the amount of$10,500. The motion carried unanimously (5- <br />0). <br /> <br />C. Motion to Award the Job Classification and Compensation Stndv to Rilev, <br />Dettmann & Kelsev LLC in the Amount of $10,535.00 <br /> <br />Mr. Johnson stated the City last completed ajob classification and compensation study in 2002. <br />In January, 2008, the City is required by state law to submit a pay equity report to the Minnesota <br />Department of Employee Relations. To assist City staff with completing the State of Minnesota <br />mandated pay equity requirement and evaluate the City's existing compensation system, staff is <br />proposing the hiring of an outside consultant to assist with completing this project. <br /> <br />In 2007, the City budgeted $15,000 for this project. The intent of the job classification and <br />compensation study is to ensure that the City is in compliance with the State of Minnesota's pay <br />