Laserfiche WebLink
<br />City of Arden Hills <br />Budget Analysis Report <br />May 04,2006 <br />Page 3 <br /> <br /> <br />Budget Analysis <br /> <br />Develop a multi-year network level budget analysis <br />The City has requested that GoodPointe Technology perform a number of budget <br />scenario projections to obtain a general idea of how the City pavement network is <br />changing with time, given the best available information from the street condition survey, <br />Arden Hills pavement performance data, pavement maintenance, repair, and <br />rehabilitation unit cost data and general budget provisions of the City. <br /> <br />Process Summary <br />With the ICON softWare, GoodPointe Technology used the pavement performance data <br />to project the condition of the PCI into the future and to calculate the amount of deferred <br />maintenance, repair, and rehabilitation work (backlog) present in the network in each <br />year of the 30-year scenarios induded in this report. <br /> <br />From an engineering perspective, the correct application of future pavement projects <br />depends on the sequence of historical projects that have already been applied. The <br />budget module of the ICON program utilizes historical project-related data (seal coats, <br />overlays, reconstruct information) to qualify or disqualify certain projects from being <br />recommended in a given budget scenario run. For a particular alternative or strategy, <br />the user specifies: <br /> <br />1) The condition index (CI) score range for which the strategy will be considered; <br />2) The maximum number of applications the strategy can be applied successively <br />before a new strategy must be recommended; <br />3) The time interval (in years) between successive applications of the strategy; and, <br />4) The unit cost of the treatment and the category to which the strategy belongs. <br /> <br />At the start of a budget scenario, ICON will look for the most recent historical condition <br />surveyor project related information and will deteriorate the score from that historical <br />date to the date of the analysis. ICON then filters through the historical project <br />information to determine how many times each particular strategy has been applied <br />successively and what the time interval has been since the last strategy. With this <br />historical information in mind, ICON performs the life cycle cost analysis to determine <br />the optimum way to spend your budget in the future given the practical constraints of <br />how your strategies need to be programmed. <br /> <br />A practical constraint associated with running budget analysis scenarios involves the <br />amount of budget that is allocated to the different categories of pavement maintenance, <br />repair, and rehabilitation (seal coat, overlays, reconstructs). Care must be taken not to <br />allocate too much money to a given category (e.g. sealcoats), if it exceeds the realistic <br />amount of seal coat projects that the City is able to contract and manage, for example. <br /> <br />Development of Majntenance Strategies <br />The optimal combination of maintenance methods is the one that provides maximum <br />benefit for the least cost. The following figure illustrates an example of how the <br />maintenance benefit can be derived. <br />