Laserfiche WebLink
<br />ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION - MAY 21, 2007 <br /> <br />6 <br /> <br />A discussion on the meetings ensued. <br /> <br />Ms. Frick reported a public hearing is scheduled for November 1, 2007; however, it could <br />be held at any time during the 30-day comment period. She explained a public hearing is <br />not required to initiate an AUAR; however, it is a good idea. She commented Council is <br />required to set the boundaries of the AUAR with the understanding that the scenario <br />could be updated. She explained there must be a Council resolution that formally <br />initiates an AUAR. She indicated the 120-day clock starts the day an AUAR is ordered <br />until the fmal AUAR is issued. <br /> <br />Community Development Director Barton stated an extension could be applied for. <br /> <br />Councilmember Holden asked what happens between June 25 and July 19, 2007. <br /> <br />Ms. Frick replied Council and staff could wait to initiate the AUAR, as long as there is <br />the understanding that SRF would continue to work on this. She stated that if the <br />refinement is substantial enough that it should have an updated resolution, it could be <br />looked at. <br /> <br />Mayor Harpstead questioned if, given that a public hearing is scheduled after that date, <br />Council could delay a vote authorizing an AUAR until after the public hearing. <br /> <br />Ms. Frick advised the group that the state process states the order does not have to occur <br />at that time; however, the work continues. <br /> <br />Councilmember Hohnes asked if the resolution made on June 25 must be specific. <br /> <br />Ms. Frick replied it could include a range oflanguage. She commented that what Council <br />did not want is something more intense or to analyze the wrong things. Ms. Frick asked <br />Council to look at the key dates. <br /> <br />Community Development Director Barton asked how the timeline would be affected if <br />the resolution were not done until after July 19, 2007. <br /> <br />Ms. Frick replied it would not be affected. She commented the value of the timeline to <br />the consultant is to make sure everyone is on the same page. <br /> <br />Councilmember McClung asked Council and staff to look at the dates to make sure they <br />do not conflict with other items on the calendar. <br /> <br />City Administrator Wolfe stated it would be incorporated into the overall timeline. <br />