My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
05-21-07 Minutes
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
City Council
>
City Council Packets
>
2000-2009
>
2007
>
05-21-07-WS
>
05-21-07 Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/28/2007 4:55:13 PM
Creation date
6/28/2007 4:55:01 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
Document
05-21-07 Minutes
General - Type
City Council Work Session Minutes
Date
5/21/2007
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
15
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION - MAY 21, 2007 <br /> <br />6 <br /> <br />A discussion on the meetings ensued. <br /> <br />Ms. Frick reported a public hearing is scheduled for November 1, 2007; however, it could <br />be held at any time during the 30-day comment period. She explained a public hearing is <br />not required to initiate an AUAR; however, it is a good idea. She commented Council is <br />required to set the boundaries of the AUAR with the understanding that the scenario <br />could be updated. She explained there must be a Council resolution that formally <br />initiates an AUAR. She indicated the 120-day clock starts the day an AUAR is ordered <br />until the fmal AUAR is issued. <br /> <br />Community Development Director Barton stated an extension could be applied for. <br /> <br />Councilmember Holden asked what happens between June 25 and July 19, 2007. <br /> <br />Ms. Frick replied Council and staff could wait to initiate the AUAR, as long as there is <br />the understanding that SRF would continue to work on this. She stated that if the <br />refinement is substantial enough that it should have an updated resolution, it could be <br />looked at. <br /> <br />Mayor Harpstead questioned if, given that a public hearing is scheduled after that date, <br />Council could delay a vote authorizing an AUAR until after the public hearing. <br /> <br />Ms. Frick advised the group that the state process states the order does not have to occur <br />at that time; however, the work continues. <br /> <br />Councilmember Hohnes asked if the resolution made on June 25 must be specific. <br /> <br />Ms. Frick replied it could include a range oflanguage. She commented that what Council <br />did not want is something more intense or to analyze the wrong things. Ms. Frick asked <br />Council to look at the key dates. <br /> <br />Community Development Director Barton asked how the timeline would be affected if <br />the resolution were not done until after July 19, 2007. <br /> <br />Ms. Frick replied it would not be affected. She commented the value of the timeline to <br />the consultant is to make sure everyone is on the same page. <br /> <br />Councilmember McClung asked Council and staff to look at the dates to make sure they <br />do not conflict with other items on the calendar. <br /> <br />City Administrator Wolfe stated it would be incorporated into the overall timeline. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.