Laserfiche WebLink
<br />additional variances, which were withdrawn by the applicant prior to the August 1, 2007, <br />Planning Commission meeting, The withdrawn variances do not require any action by the City <br />Council. <br /> <br />Findinl!:s of Fact <br /> <br />The Planning Commission offers the following thirteen findings of fact for review: <br /> <br />General Findings: <br />1. The lot size of 15,241 square feet and the lot dimensions are conforming III the <br />underlying R.2 Zone, <br />2. The existing dwelling meetings all property line setbacks. <br />3. The proposed dwelling would be as close as 18 feet to the western property line, which is <br />a twelve foot encroachment into the rear setback. <br />4, The proposed dwelling does not encroach on any other required setbacks, <br />5, The existing detached accessory structure is nonconforming because it encroaches into <br />the southern side yard and western property line setbacks, The existing accessory <br />structure is inches from the western property line and approximately six feet from the <br />southern side property line. <br />6, Reconstructing the existing accessory structure to the same dimensions or less would not <br />require a variance. <br />7, The proposed new dwelling does not exceed the 35 foot height limit. <br />8, The proposed new dwelling and accessory structure are permitted uses in the R-2 Zone. <br />9, The existing dwelling and the proposed garage are outside of the 100-year flood plain, <br />wetlands, and easements. <br /> <br />On the Variance Request: <br />10. A dwelling with attached garage is a reasonable use within the R-2 Zone. <br />11, The lot does not have any unique characteristics that warrant the approval of the variance. <br />A structure can be built that respects all setback requirements in the underlying zone. <br />12. Given the location of the property and development characteristics of adjacent properties, <br />it is unlikely that the proposed dwelling and attached garage would negatively impact the <br />character of the surrounding neighborhood or City. The structure to the south is 40 feet <br />from the western property line while the structures to the north are close as ten feet to the <br />western property line, <br />13, The proposed plans and setback variance for the dwelling do not appear to be based <br />entirely on economic considerations, <br /> <br />Recommendation <br /> <br />The Planning Commission recommends denial (6-0) of Planning Case 07-017 for a Variance at <br />3441 Lake Johanna Boulevard Based on the Findings of Fact in the August 13,2007, Planning <br />Case Report. <br /> <br />\\Metro-inet.us\ardenhi//slPlanninglPlanning Cases\2007\07-016 Gonzalez Variance (PCDenia/)\081307 - CC Report- Gonzalez Variance.doc <br /> <br />Page 2 00 <br />