My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
08-13-07 Agenda Item 4C
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
City Council
>
City Council Packets
>
2000-2009
>
2007
>
08-13-07-R
>
08-13-07 Agenda Item 4C
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/9/2007 2:29:17 PM
Creation date
8/9/2007 2:22:38 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
Document
Planning Case 07-017 Deny Variance
General - Type
Agenda Item
Addressee
3441 Lake Johanna Blvd.
Date
8/13/2007
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
15
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />ARDEN HILLS PLANNING COMMISSION - JULY 11, 2007 <br /> <br />7 <br /> <br />D. PLANNING CASE #07-016 - VARIANCE: RICHARD GONZALEZ; 3441 LAKE <br />JOHANNA BOULEVARD <br /> <br />Mr. Lehnhoff stated the applicant is requesting three variances for a proposal to <br />redevelop 3441 Lake Johanna Boulevard, The first variance request is a rear/front yard <br />setback encroachment for a dwelling with an attached garage. The second variance <br />request is to relocate and reconstruct a nonconforming accessory structure, The third <br />variance request is to construct a new partial gravel driveway, <br /> <br />He indicated because this application involves three separate variance requests that are <br />not contingent upon each other, the analysis, recommendation, and conditions for each <br />variance is provided separately. <br /> <br />Variance 1: Dwelling Front/Rear Yard Setback Encroachment <br /> <br />The findings of fact for variance number one do not specifically support a <br />recommendation for denial or approvaL A single family home is a permitted use in the <br />R-2 Zone and it is a reasonable use for this property. The variance is unlikely to <br />negatively impact the neighborhood or City because there is already a structure on the <br />property. It does not appear that the variance is based on economic considerations alone, <br />As is often the case, the evaluation criterion that states, "The plight ofthe landowner is <br />due to circumstances unique to the property not created by the landowner," is the difficult <br />evaluation criterion, While there is an existing conforming dwelling on the property, it is <br />smaller than the neighboring houses and the topography does present some unique <br />challenges for redevelopment The topography would require fill to redevelop the <br />property with the proposed plans and to meet a full 30 foot setback from Fairview <br />Avenue. Before making a motion for approval or denial, this specific variance evaluation <br />criterion must be addressed for the record, <br /> <br />If the Planning Commission recommends approval on this variance, Staff recommends <br />the following six conditions: <br /> <br />1. The project shall be completed in accordance with the plans submitted as amended by <br />the conditions of approvaL Any significant changes to these plans, as determined by the <br />City Planner, shall require review and approval by the Planning Commission, <br /> <br />2. The applicant shall use best management practices (BMPs) to control erosion at all <br />times during construction. <br /> <br />3. Retaining walls greater than four feet in height shall be engineered and shall require a <br />building permit <br /> <br />4. Existing retaining walls shall not be replaced and new retaining walls shall not be <br />constructed within the Lake Johanna Boulevard right-of-way without written approval <br />from Ramsey County. <br /> <br />5, The applicant shall obtain approval from the Rice Creek Watershed District prior to <br />the issuance of any building permits, <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.