Laserfiche WebLink
<br />~ <br /> <br /> <br />~ <br />EN HILLS <br /> <br />DATE: <br /> <br />August 16, 2007 <br /> <br />AGENDA ITEM 2.D <br /> <br /> <br />MEMORANDUM <br /> <br />TO: <br /> <br />Mayor and City Council <br />Michelle Wolfe, City Administra:~A / <br /> <br />Kristine Giga, Civil Engineer I'f-r <br />Greg Hoag, Public Works Director <br /> <br />FROM: <br /> <br />SUBJECT: <br /> <br />PMP Philosophy <br /> <br />BACKGROUND <br /> <br />Staff is working on the City's fIve-year Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) from 2008 to 2012, <br />particularly with respect to the Pavement Management Program (PMP) projects. The purpose of <br />this discussion is to receive feedback from the City Council on the PMP philosophy in order to <br />proceed with CIP planning in a manner that the City Council supports. <br /> <br />DISCUSSION <br /> <br />Attached is a copy of the Pavement Management philosophy that was adopted by the City <br />Council in 2001. Staff feels this document should be updated. In the last six years, standard <br />maintenance strategies have evolved, and as a result, the City has modifIed its approach to the <br />pavement management program. <br /> <br />Listed below are factors that staff considers when recommending the annual PMP improvement <br />projects. Some of these factors are currently included in the existing PMP policy; others are <br />items staff would like to incorporate into a revised document. <br />. Capture mill and overlays at the appropriate life of the pavement- not too late, but also <br />not too early. <br />. Consider other reasons for reconstruction: utility issues, storm water management, <br />structural/sub-grade problems that cannot be solved by a mill and overlay. <br />. Correct safety issues in deteriorated streets that may cause damage to vehicles, bicycles, <br />or walkers in our neighborhoods. <br /> <br />\\Metro-inctus\ardenhills\PR&PW\Engineering\2007\ Work _ Sessions\8-20-07 _Memo _PMP _Philosophy.doc <br />