My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
09-10-07 Item 7C, I-694 EA
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
City Council
>
City Council Packets
>
2000-2009
>
2007
>
09-10-07-R
>
09-10-07 Item 7C, I-694 EA
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/6/2007 3:02:47 PM
Creation date
9/6/2007 3:00:10 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
Document
Item 7C, I-694 Env Assessment
General - Type
Agenda Item
Date
9/10/2007
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
7
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />DRAfT <br /> <br />e. It would seem probable that the existing westbound Hamline-Snelling 694 exit <br />ramp volume will be reassigned to the Lexington Avenue exit ramp with the <br />selected alternative. It would seem worthwhile to review the existing traffic on <br />the Hamline-Snelling ramp and reassign this volume to Lexington A venue <br />ramp to test the reasonableness of the 2030 forecast. <br /> <br />f. The 2030 peak hour volumes on the 1-694 Ramps at Lexington Avenue as <br />shown in Appendix 3, Figure 3 seem to be low compared to some existing <br />traffic counts. Specifically, year 2003 count at the north intersection shows a <br />volume of998 vehicles during the AM peak hour. The 2030 traffic projection <br />shows 1,279 vehicles. This seems abnormally low considering that traffic <br />using HamJine will now have to use Lexington, and that 27 years will have <br />passed. Assuming a background traffic growth of 1 % per year, for 998 <br />vehicles in 2003, results in 1,306 vehicles in 2030, higher than the year 2030 <br />projection. If one adds to this the traffic that would have been using HamJine, <br />and the 2030 traffic project is too low. <br /> <br />g. The 2030 modeling seems to indicate improbable conclusions at the signalized <br />intersections on the Lexington Ramp locations. In addition to the lower than <br />expected volumes on the ramps in 2030, the "Build" condition indicates an <br />improved level of service at the south ramps in the PM compared to the "No <br />Build" condition. Does the Build scenario result in lowering the ramp <br />volumes, or does the Build scenario include intersection improvements not <br />shown on the geometric layout provided in the draft EA? <br /> <br />2. Social. Economic. and Environmental <br /> <br />a. The analysis of social, economic and environmental impacts seems to be <br />rather minimal across the study location, except for possibly noise. <br /> <br />b. The nighttime decibel levels under Minnesota State Noise Standards are 55 <br />decibels for a residential area, while the Federal level is 70 for residential <br />areas. Arden Hills has three noise monitoring locations: <br />. Nl: South ofI-694 between TH 10 and 1-35W <br /> <br />. N2: South ofI-694 between TH 10 and TH 51 (near Bethel College) <br /> <br />. N3: North ofI-694 east ofTH 10 <br /> <br />Existing nighttime noise monitoring results indicate 62.0, 60.5 and 70.3 levels <br />respectively for the three locations. These levels are all higher than the state <br />level and slightly higher than the Federal level on N3. The 2030 projected <br />noise levels at the NI and N3 locations are projected to both exceed the state <br />and federal levels without noise barriers. While noise barriers at these <br />locations may not meet MnlDOT's cost effectiveness criteria, the City of <br />Arden Hills would like these to be further considered. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.