Laserfiche WebLink
• <br /> APJ EN HILLS <br /> MEMORANDUM <br /> DATE: September 7, 2007 <br /> TO: Financial Planning and Analysis Committee <br /> FROM: Sue Iverson, Finance Director` " <br /> SUBJECT: Fund Balance Policy Discussions <br /> BACKGROUND: <br /> One of the priorities that the Council has assigned to this committee is to work on a Fund <br /> Balance Policy. At the August 14, 2007 meeting we began these discussions. We looked at the <br /> reasons and objectives for such a policy and discussed factors that we wanted to consider in <br /> • developing our policy. We also looked at what information we would need in order to make <br /> these decisions. <br /> DISCUSSION: <br /> As a result of the last meeting,we determined that we still have some questions to be answered. <br /> One of these was how rating agencies look at these factors and how do they compare with what <br /> is done in the private sector. As a way to better help answer those questions and also give the <br /> committee a broader prospective I have asked a friend of mine who used to work for Moody's <br /> Investor Services to speak at our meeting. He will explain how these policies are looked at by <br /> the rating agencies and how they compare to private sector. He will also be able to give you <br /> examples of various projects or policies that they used in making determinations in issuing credit <br /> ratings. Whether we use bonding,Tax Increment Financing(TIF), other financing tools, or just <br /> our own resources; this will be relevant information to answer your questions and also explain <br /> how outside agencies, creditors, or the public may look at our policies and structure. Feel free to <br /> ask him any questions you may have. <br /> Our goal is to establish 1) How financial resources are to be set aside for unreserved fund <br /> balances, 2)Determine the appropriate size of unreserved fund balances, and 3) Methods for <br /> utilizing unreserved fund balance resources. <br /> S <br />