My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
12-05-07-WS/PC
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
Commissions, Committees, and Boards
>
Planning Commission
>
Planning Commission Packets
>
2004-2009
>
PC Packets 2007
>
12-05-07-WS/PC
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/12/2015 12:55:11 PM
Creation date
11/29/2007 1:24:42 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
100
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />however, it is not anticipated that this project will impede traffic flow around the building <br />since it is designed to be in line with the existing structure. <br /> <br /> <br />D. Landscaping - No Specific Requirements <br /> <br />The City does not have specific landscaping requirements for this type of addition; <br />however, the City can require reasonable screening and landscaping through the <br />conditional use permit amendment process. No existing landscaping will be impacted by <br />the proposed smoking deck. <br /> <br />E. Parking - No Expected Impact <br /> <br />The proposed addition will not impact any existing parking stalls. <br /> <br />2. Additional Review <br /> <br />The Building Official submitted his comments addressing this project plan (Attachment 3B- <br />2). Initially he expressed concerns over the design of the walls and that they do not meet the <br />State requirements for the smoking ban. According to the Building Official, the walls must <br />be at least 50 percent open; however, functionally two of the walls of this structure are the <br />exterior walls of the existing building, thus full walls. The remaining two walls would need <br />to be 100 percent open in order to meet the State requirements. In order to meet State <br />requirements these walls would need to be removed entirely to make the structure 50 percent <br />open. The Public Health Official with the Ramsey County Department of Public Health <br />reviewed the initial plans submitted to the City from the applicant and concurs that they did <br />not meet the State requirements of the Freedom to Breathe Act. <br /> <br />In response to this determination, the applicant submitted revised plans that show two fully <br />enclosed walls, one fully open wall (enclosed only with a screen and a fence), and one wall <br />that is half open (Attachment 3B-l). In addition, a portion of the roof is proposed to be open, <br />thus creating a structure that is fifty percent open. These plans have not yet been reviewed <br />by the Public Health Official with Ramsey County, but will need to be approved prior to <br />issuing a building permit. According to the Public Health Official, the State smoking ban <br />would permit screens and fences on open walls. <br /> <br />If this CUP Amendment is approved, the applicant will need to build a structure that meets <br />the City's building code and fire code, as well as the State requirements for outdoor smoking <br />areas per the Freedom to Breathe Act. <br /> <br />3. Conditional Use Permit Amendment/Site Plan Review Criteria - Section 1355.04 Snbd 3 <br /> <br />City of Arden Hills <br />Planning Commission Meetingfor December 5, 2007 <br /> <br />\\Ahdocsl\AHlAHdata\PlanningIP/anning Cases\2007107-031 Blue Fox CUP Amendment (PENDING)\! 20507 - PC Report - Blue Fox CUP <br />Amendment.doc Page 4 of 7 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.