My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
11-26-07-R
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
City Council
>
City Council Minutes
>
2000-2009
>
2007
>
11-26-07-R
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/12/2007 11:31:02 AM
Creation date
12/12/2007 11:30:42 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
Document
11-26-07 Regular City Council Minutes
General - Type
City Council Minutes
Date
11/26/2007
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
14
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL - November 26, 2007 <br /> <br />8 <br /> <br />City Administrator Wolfe explained there are tools that could be implemented in the <br />future to assist staff with enforcement, such as administrative fines; however, they are not <br />available to staff at this time. She explained that administrative fines could be a useful <br />tool in code enforcement and compliance; however, there is still no guarantee that all <br />properties would be in compliance with the code 100% of the time. She stated that <br />despite the difficulties of enforcement, the City is committed to enforcing code violations. <br /> <br />Councilmember Holden requested examples of the difficulties. <br /> <br />City Administrator Wolfe replied that with some violations such as animal control, it is <br />easy to issue a fine, but issues with some the violations can change. The nature of the <br />violation is one that it must be observed for follow-up. She stated that once issued, <br />violations are often ignored and the criminal process begins. <br /> <br />City Attorney Filla replied that as an example there were a number of citations issued for <br />a property while the resident was out of state and warrants were issued that are currently <br />outstanding. He stated the property owner has had a representative clean up the property. <br />He explained the court process from beginning to end is about six months if the property <br />owner requests trial and in the mean time, the property remains in violation. He stated <br />civil action is an expensive option and recommends the City develop a standardized <br />process/procedure and stick with it. <br /> <br />Councilmember Holden asked if, after so many violations, there is way of combining <br />them or looking at them differently. <br /> <br />City Attorney Filla replied they are all misdemeanors with a maximum fine of $1 ,000 for <br />each violation or 90 days in jail. <br /> <br />Councilmember Holmes asked City Attorney Filla to comment further on administrative <br />fines. <br /> <br />City Attorney Filla stated the administrative fines could not replace traffic code <br />enforcement as it is a matter for the courts and traffic fines could not be taken away from <br />the traffic fine revenue from the courts. He explained it could be done for code violations <br />whereby citations could ultimately be imposed if previous methods of code violation <br />notification have been ignored. He stated the administrative fine system for housing code <br />violations are enough to encourage most residents to abide by the codes. <br /> <br />Councilmember Holmes questioned ifthe amount of fines are limited under state law. <br /> <br />City Attorney Filla replied they are not. <br /> <br />Mayor Harpstead questioned whether the fines uncollected could be added to property <br />taxes. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.