Laserfiche WebLink
Section 1220: Permit and Review Process <br />■ The sign permit application review timeline was brought into conformance with <br />Minnesota Statute 15.99, which is the standard review timeline for all types of planning <br />cases. Statute 15.99 is the regulation that states all applications must be reviewed within <br />60 days unless extended by the City and all decisions must be made within 120 days <br />unless extended by the applicant. Most over-the-counter sign permit applications are <br />reviewed within two to five days. <br />■ The appeal process was modified to clearly state that the Planning Commission makes a <br />recommendation to the City Council on sign permit appeals. The previous language <br />indicated that the Planning Commission made the final decision, which was not the intent <br />of the Code. <br />Section 1230: Exempt and Prohibited Signs: <br />■ The allowed address identification sign size was increased from two square feet to four <br />square feet to provide more flexibility for property owners to adequately display their <br />address numbers without needing a sign permit. <br />• Internal signs were exempted from needing a permit. This is a new definition that was <br />formerly included with auxiliary signs and is not a policy change. Internal signs refer to <br />those signs that are not visible from adjacent properties or the public right-of-way. Since <br />those types of signs have no impact on the City, a permit is not needed. <br />■ Dynamic display signs are specifically prohibited in this section. <br />Section 1240: General Sign Regulations <br />• The definition of sign district four was clarified so that properties cannot fall into <br />multiple sign districts as was the case with the Arden Plaza redevelopment application. <br />• In subdivision two, the regulations for determining permitted sign areas for freestanding <br />signs was clarified but the intent was not significantly changed. <br />• Since auxiliary and internal signs are not visible from adjacent properties or the right-of- <br />way and since they are exempt from permits, the regulations by sign district were deleted <br />from Table One. <br />Section 1250: Special Provisions <br />■ The regulations allocating signage on multi -tenant properties were clarified. The intent <br />of the regulations has not changed, but the regulations will now be easier to enforce since <br />there is less room for interpretation. A multi -tenant property is treated like one parcel for <br />monument/freestanding signs, and the property owner is responsible for allocating the <br />permitted signage. <br />■ The temporary signage language was amended to limit a business to no more than three <br />temporary signs each year and, on each occasion the temporary sign can be in place for <br />no more than 30 days. The permits could be used consecutively. The previous code had <br />been interpreted to allow an indefinite number of signs but the sign could only be up for <br />30 days. Staff is uncomfortable with that previously used interpretation because, in <br />City of Arden Hills <br />Planning Commission Meeting for January 9, 2008 <br />IlMetro-inet.uslardenhillslPlanninglPlanning Cases12008108-004 Sign Code (UPCOMING)1010908 - PCReport -Sign Code Update.doc <br />Page 3 of 5 <br />