Laserfiche WebLink
<br />ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL - JULY 23, 2007 <br /> <br />6 <br /> <br />that she worked on a project like this, and she could work with Mr. Roy to obtain more <br />information. <br /> <br />Mayor Harpstead asked, will we lose State and federal funding if nothing happens at Highway 10 <br />and 96? Mr. Roy stated that he believes the crash rate will increase, congestion will increase, <br />traffic on local roads will increase, but money will be spent elsewhere if a decision isn't made <br />regarding this intersection. <br /> <br />A resident stated that if a second signal was added north of the current signal, it will end up being <br />problematic onto I-35W, creating back-ups on the Interstate, which would be unsafe. <br /> <br />Resident George Grenander referenced the 2005 environmental studies for I-694/Hamline/I-35W. <br />He understood that noise walls have been found to not be economically feasible. Mr. Goess <br />responded that measurements were taken and modeled, and they studied decibel reduction and <br />cost effectiveness. The results were such that Mn/DOT would not propose noise walls. That <br />does not mean that Mn/DOT could not work with the City to help with identifying funding. Mr. <br />Grenander stated that he would like the elevation information and asked if that had been taken <br />into account. Mr. Goess responded that yes, they have studied the elevations. He stated that the <br />problem is that the homes are so high; noise walls are not as effective. The environmental <br />document should be available in the next year or so. He referenced the Mn/DOT formula <br />regarding noise walls and the difference in funding has to be made up from somewhere else. A <br />resident noted that noise rises up with elevations. Mr. Goess responded that normally, a noise <br />wall is not effective past the first row of homes. A resident asked, are you planning a sound wall <br />along Highway 96 near Arden Manor? Ms. Bloom stated that there are 263 projects on the <br />State's list; the area north of Highway 96 is ranked 15th, so a wall may be built if it continues to <br />rise up the list. Mr. Tolaas stated that they had discussed noise walls as part of the County Rod <br />96 project, but at the time residents didn't want them due to loss of sunlight. <br /> <br />A resident asked when the measurements are taken for noise wall studies. He stated that if you <br />take the signal away, there will be more traffic and more noise. Mr. Goess responded that they <br />measure when traffic tends to be loudest and at free flow. Mr. Roy stated that it takes twice as <br />much traffic to general a 2-3 decibel increase. A resident stated that you should look at the total <br />proj ect when discussing noise walls. <br /> <br />A resident voiced concern about traffic on Highway 96. Mr. Roy stated that Highway 96 is <br />probably currently being used as a cut-through because of current congestion on 1-694 caused by <br />the unweave the weave project, and the Highway 36 project. <br /> <br />Mr. Haick stated that I-35W hasn't kept up with what it needs to do, and that is the real problem. <br />Mr. Roy indicated that the State has $24 billion in needs but only gets about $250 million. There <br />is about a $1 billion shortfall per year. Mr. Haick stated that 1-35W is the problem. He asked, <br />why does Arden Hills have to take this traffic on Highway 10? He questioned what the trade-off <br />is for Arden Hills. We lose our access. He stated that City should be fighting for the residents. <br />Another resident stated that we need public transportation. Mr. Grenander added that we don't <br />