My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
7A, 10 and 96 Concept Plan
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
City Council
>
City Council Packets
>
2000-2009
>
2008
>
01-28-08-R
>
7A, 10 and 96 Concept Plan
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/25/2008 3:15:41 PM
Creation date
1/25/2008 3:13:55 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
Document
Highway 10 and 96 Concept Plan
General - Type
Agenda Item
Date
1/28/2008
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
11
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />~ <br />~~HILLS <br /> <br />CITY OF ARDEN HILLS <br />COUNTY OF RAMSEY <br />STATE OF MINNESOTA <br /> <br />RESOLUTION NO. 2008-008 <br /> <br />A RESOLUTION SELECTING PREFERRED CONCEPT FOR HIGHWAY 10/96 <br />INTERCHANGE PROJECT <br /> <br />BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of Arden Hills (the "City"), as <br />follows: <br /> <br />WHEREAS, the City and Ramsey County (the "County") have for the past decade <br />discussed the need f(lI- improvements to the intersection of County Road 96 and Trunk Highway <br />lOin the City (referred to as the "10/96 Interchange"): and <br /> <br />WHEREAS, traffic volumes at the 10/96 Interchangc have led to a low level of service <br />rating by the Minnesota Department of Transportation ('"MnDOT") and a rank of 21 on <br />MnDOT's list of the top 200 aceident-prone intcrchanges in the State; and <br /> <br />WHEREAS, MnDOT, the County and the City have all determincd that improvements to <br />the 10/96 Interchange arc needed to address these long-standing public safety concerns, and the <br />County has already sccurcd fedcral funds and its own funds to undertakc gradc separation work <br />at the interchange; and <br /> <br />WHEREAS, MnDOT has also dctcrmincd that the Trunk Highway 10 diagonal bctwccn <br />1-694 and 1-35W, and improvements to thc 10/96 Interchange, arc vital to thc regional <br />transpOliation system and must remain in place: and <br /> <br />WHEREAS, the City has dctcIlnincd a nccd to maintain acccss to and from Trunk <br />Highway 10 f()r busincsscs and residents within the trianglc f(lrIncd by Trunk Highway 10, 1-694 <br />and I-35W (thc "Trianglc Area"), and for futurc busincss and residcnts aftcr redevclopment of <br />the Twin Citics Army Ammunition Plant ("TCAAP") sitc: and <br /> <br />WHEREAS, in ordcr to addrcss both thc safcty and acccss issues, MnDOT, thc County <br />and thc City havc all dctcrmincd that the most reasonablc solution involves grade separation at <br />thc actual intcrchange of Trunk Highway 10 and County Road 96 along with construction of a <br />new interchange at some point along the diagonal between County Road 96 and 1-35W (such <br />improvements being referred to collectively as the "10/96 Interchange Improvcmcnts"); and <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.