Laserfiche WebLink
<br />The other park dedication requirements since 2002 have related to residential <br />subdivisions, and thc average park dedication fee has bcen approximately $5,200 per new <br />lot. <br /> <br />If the City Council deems CMK's proposals to be inadequate, there is still time to <br />continue negotiations before the statutory review deadline expires. It is important that <br />CMK sufficiently offset the park and recreational needs created by their use; however, <br />based on the City's regulations, State Statutes, and comments from the City Attorney, <br />Staff is comfortable with the revised proposal from CMK. It is important to note that the <br />City cannot deny the plat request if there is not agreement on the park dedication <br />proposal. If there is not an agreement, the City can set the requirement and CMK must <br />deposit the value of the improvements into an escrow. The park dedication requirement <br />is then evaluated by the courts. <br /> <br />Development Agreement <br /> <br />For subdivisions that include the construction of new streets and/or public utilities, the City can <br />require a development agreement (Attachment B). For this subdivision, the responsibility of <br />grading, tree removal, and utility, and drainage/stormwater work will be on the propeI1y owners <br />at the time building and grading permits are submitted. The agreement outlines the requirements <br />of the approved Final PUD; the final specifications for all grading, utilities, drainage/stormwater <br />provisions; the perf0I111anCe guarantees; and other city requirements to ensure that the <br />development is implemented as the Final Plat and PUD were approved. All grading, utility, and <br />stormwater work are subject to City review, inspection, and approval. The City Attorney <br />prepared the agreement. The developer is currently reviewing the agreement, and there may be <br />minor changes made prior to the Council meeting. If any changes are needed, revised copies will <br />be provided prior to or at the meeting. <br /> <br />Findings of Fact <br /> <br />The Planning Commission offers the following thirteen findings of fact for rcview: <br /> <br />Zoning Code Findings: <br />I. A Final PUD has been approved for this project. <br />2. Condition five of the Final PUD requires the propet1y to be replatted. <br />3. The layout in the preliminary and final plat proposal meet or exceed all of the <br />requirements of the underlying Gateway Business Zone, including minimum lot size, <br />lot width, and lot depth. <br />4. The parcel in the preliminary and final plat is capable of accommodating the <br />proposed buildings while meeting all required setbacks and coverage limits without <br />any additional variances. <br /> <br />liMl'Iro-iIlCf.us!arde/lhills\P/flllllillg\P/al1l1illg Coscsi2008\08.005 1h/l"crs(' Pre/ill/iIlOI)' & FiIUl/ Pial find Vaclltioll (PC App/'O\'ctf)!042808- CC <br />Reporl - Trlll'C/"sc !Jim. doc <br /> <br />Page 5 of7 <br />