My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
1B - 2008 Utility Rate Study
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
City Council
>
City Council Packets
>
2000-2009
>
2008
>
05-19-08-WS
>
1B - 2008 Utility Rate Study
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/15/2008 2:46:50 PM
Creation date
5/15/2008 2:44:16 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
Document
2008 Utility Rate Study
Date
5/19/2008
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
35
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />While commercial entities pay the same rate for water usage as a residence, they pay <br />higher fixed monthly meter and stand by charges, in essence paying a higher rate per <br />gallon for water used. <br /> <br />Existing Residential Rate Structure-Rate Option I: <br /> <br />This rate structure would apply to single family and multi-family residential and senior <br />residents. If the existing rate structure is not modified, the quarterly meter charge would <br />increase by $1.75 to $30.97 per quarter for a residential home in 2009, $32.83 in 2010, <br />$34.80 in 201 I, and $36.89 in 2012, or a 6.0% increase per year. <br /> <br />Commercial and industrial users would pay an increase of 6.0% based on the meter size. <br /> <br />The City has seen water consumption increase with the popularity of lawn sprinkler <br />systems, and staff has emphasized the increasing importance of water conservation and <br />the need to charge those who necessitate over sizing of the system for peak usage. The <br />Minnesota DNR is putting pressure on cities to implement conservation measures, and is <br />reluctant to issue permits to cities for new wells if conservation measures are not in place. <br />A pricing structure that makes heavy lawn watering more expensive is one way to <br />encourage conservation. The current rate structure does not provide incentives for water <br />conservation Rate structure Options II and 1ll do provide an incentive for conserving <br />water resources as is shown on Appendix F. <br /> <br />Residential Rate Option II <br /> <br />This tier option would keep the existing base usage of 10,000 gallons, but institute two <br />tiers above it. The first tier above the base usage would be for usage up to 35,000 gallons, <br />or the next 25,000 gallons of usage, and would be charged at $2.73 per thousand gallons. <br />The second tier above the base usage would be for all usage over 35,000 gallons and <br />would be charged at $4.78 per thousand gallons. This tier option produces $1,040,000 in <br />usage revenues, or roughly equal to the amount of purchased water charges paid to the <br />City of Roseville. The meter charge increases slightly for a residential user from the <br />present amount of $29.22 to $32 and for a senior residence from no current charge to $17. <br />The fixed charges, (meter charge and stand by charge) generates $505,800 in revenues, or <br />equal to the amount of fixed charges such as salaries, contractual and general fund admin <br />charge. Total revenues then, equal approximately $1,546,000. <br /> <br />This option captures 41 % of the water usage in the base, 40% in the second tier and 19% <br />in the top tier. <br /> <br />The average residential user then has a usage charge which represents approximately <br />51 % of their water bill. The proportion becomes higher as the usage goes up and the rate <br />per gallon becomes higher with greater usage, which provides an incentive to conserve <br />water. The average residential user of 25,000 gallons per quarter pays $.0032 per gallon <br />and a higher residential user of 50,000 gallons per quarter pays $.0071 per gallon. The <br />low senior user (16,000 gallons) would pay $.0016 per gallon. l' <br /> <br />8 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.