Laserfiche WebLink
<br />This rate tier option would provide an incentive for water conservation and would likely <br />provide a buffer to the city for lower usages which would occur during wet weather <br />summers because there is an even split between usage charges and fixed fees. The <br />proposed rate for Option 11 is shown in greater detail on Appendix F. <br /> <br />Residential Rate Option III <br /> <br />This tier option shows a meter charge for all usage and the corresponding fixed meter <br />charge decreases dramatically. A residential user meter charge decreases from $29.22 to <br />$9 and the senior residence increases from no charge to $9. The first tier would include <br />all usage to 15,000 gallons at $1.50 per thousand gallons. The second tier would be for <br />the next 20,000 gallon usage or from 15,001 to 35,000 at $3.25 per thousand gallons. The <br />third and final tier would be for usage over 35,001 gallons billed at $4.88 per thousand <br />gallons. The revenues generated equal $311,900 in fixed charges and $1,285,700 in usage <br />charges for a total of $1 ,597,600. <br /> <br />Under this option, usage charges represent a higher percentage of the total bill than <br />Option 11. The average residential user then has a usage charge which represents <br />approximately 81 % of their water bill. The proportion becomes higher as the usage goes <br />up and the rate per gallon becomes higher with greater usage, which provides an <br />incentive to conserve water. The average residential user of 25,000 gallons per quarter <br />pays $.0027 per gallon and a higher residential user of 50,000 gallons per quarter pays <br />$.0070 per gallon. The low senior user (16,000 gallons) would pay $.0016 per gallon. <br /> <br />This option captures 56% of the water usage in the first tier, 26% in the second tier and <br />the remainder in the top tier. <br /> <br />The proposed rate for Option III is shown in greater detail on Appendix F <br /> <br />WAC Fees <br /> <br />We are recommending that the City study the costs of extending water utility services to <br />the TCAAP area and institute development fees in order to recoup costs of the <br />improvement. Some cities in the metro area have made it a policy decision to recover a <br />targeted percentage of construction costs through WAC and SAC charges. The remainder <br />of the costs would be recovered through user charges. <br /> <br />Cash Balallces <br /> <br />Operating Reserve <br /> <br />We recommend the water fund carry a m1l11mUm cash balance for operations of an <br />amount equal to 50% of operating expenses excluding depreciation plus annual debt <br />service. Cash balances are available to accommodate fluctuations in revenue depending <br />on weather and higher than anticipated operating expenses. /, <br />I <br /> <br />9 <br />