My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Item 8A, Update on Interstate 694, Hwy 10, and CR 96
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
City Council
>
City Council Packets
>
2000-2009
>
2008
>
05-27-08-R
>
Item 8A, Update on Interstate 694, Hwy 10, and CR 96
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/22/2008 4:32:41 PM
Creation date
5/22/2008 4:30:04 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
Document
Update on I-694, Hwy 10, CR 96
General - Type
Agenda Item
Date
5/27/2008
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
27
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />~ <br />~~HILLS <br /> <br />MEMORANDUM <br /> <br />DATE: <br /> <br />May 8, 2008 <br /> <br />TO: <br />FROM: <br />SUBJECT: <br /> <br />Mayor and City Council <br />Jim Willis, Interim City Administrator 6 <br />Noise Walls <br /> <br />Thc Council has indicatcd that addressing noise issucs for residcntial properties impactcd by the TH <br />IO/CR96 projcet is a major issuc rclated to thc TCAAP dcvelopment and TH 1 O-CR 96 transportation <br />improvements. <br /> <br />This issue ariscs, in part, from an carlier study conducted for MnDOT rclating to the I 694 35E to <br />35W project. The Environmental Assessment for that projcct examined noise impacts upon residential <br />properties in Arden Hills gcncrally from the area west of Hamline along the northcrly side of 1694 and <br />TH 10 to the end of their projcet limits. Their study indicated that the noisc impacts upon the <br />rcsidcntial propcrties within the study area did not mcet all three eritcria required lor noise walls to bc <br />installed with thc project. Thus whilc noise Icvels might increase as a rcsult of thc growth of <br />additional traffic, the cost/benefit threshold for thc installation of noise walls was not reached Jlcr <br />MnDOT policy. <br /> <br />Thc City requested the MnDOT examinc noise impacts northerly of the f (,94 project limits to CR96. <br />MnDOT agrced. SEH was givcn the task. Thc March 18 SEH 'THIO Barrier Study" addrcssed this <br />matter as it relates to rcsidcntial propcrties on both the cast and west sides ofTH 10 north of I ()<)4 to <br />CR96. This rep0l1 was and submitted to the City Council at your April 14 Work Session. <br /> <br />The SEH study reached the same conclusion as the early noisc study: residential propcrtics within the <br />study arca did not meet all three criteria required for the installation of noise walls. <br /> <br />Somc have suggested that if MnDOT can not be persuaded to construct appropriate noise walls, thc <br />City should do so to protect the affcctcd residents, <br /> <br />The Council has the authority to spend public funds for such improvements. Thc 2007 estimatcd cost <br />for 20 foot high wooden noise walls is about $300 per lincal foot, or $1,600,000 pcr mile, [SEH <br />"THIO Barrier Study", pagc 5]. <br /> <br />On the attachcd map I have highlighted in yellow thc approximate limits of the earlier MnDOT noise <br />study for the I 694 project and the more recent SEH noise study in pink. Assuming 20 foot noise walls <br />were constructed the full length of the study area, nearly 12,500 fcct, the cost would be approximately <br />$3,800,000, <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.