My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
7B, 2009 PMP & Resolution 2008-030
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
City Council
>
City Council Packets
>
2000-2009
>
2008
>
09-8-08-R
>
7B, 2009 PMP & Resolution 2008-030
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/10/2008 10:07:48 AM
Creation date
9/10/2008 10:06:37 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
Document
2009 PMP & Resolution 2008-030
General - Type
2009 PMP & Resolution 2008-030
Date
9/8/2008
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
25
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />9/4/2008 <br />Page 2 <br /> <br />will be a not to exceed cost based on actual hours spent on the project. The proposal amounts are <br />listed below: <br /> <br />Consultant Proposed Fees <br />Bolton & Menk $147,238 <br />MFRA $176,000 <br />WSB $221,528 <br />Kimley-Hom $237,380 <br /> <br />Staff recommends Bolton & Menk, Inc. for this work. Bolton & Menk staff is experienced in <br />municipal street reconstruction projects, including underground utility design, rain gardens and <br />other storm water best management practices. Bolton & Menk staff has worked on other projects <br />that fall within the Rice Creek Watershed District's jurisdiction, and is familiar with their rules <br />and requirements on street reconstruction projects. Bolton & Menk has also recently been <br />working with the City on other transportation related projects; City staff has had a positive <br />experience with this firm and feels tIle proposal that has been submitted best meets the intent of <br />the project and the City's needs. <br /> <br />The approval of the attached resolution is required for the Minnesota Chapter 429 Assessment <br />Process. City Council has already directed staff to begin the feasibility study; the resolution is <br />being presented at this time to ensure that proper procedures are followed for the project. <br /> <br />FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS <br /> <br />From March 2007, through July, 2008, Roseville's Engineering Department has expensed <br />$50,893.29 in fees for field survey and beginning preliminary design. Combined with Bolton & <br />Menk's proposed fees of $147,238, the total engineering fees for the project are estimated at <br />$] 98,131.29; this is consistent with what staff had originally anticipated for this project. These <br />engineering services will be paid for from the PIR Fund; these fees are incorporated into the total <br />project cost that is assessed back to property owners. <br /> <br />The breakdown of project fees is attached in the proposal submitted by Bolton & Menk. The <br />consultant is aware that fees pertaining to final design and construction services are contingent <br />upon the City Council ordering final plans following the public hearing. <br /> <br />The 2008 budget includes $35,000 for the preparation of a feasibility report. Roseville's <br />Engineering Department has spent $4,946.62 in 2008. Bolton & Menk's estimate to complete <br />the feasibility report is $15,434. These two expenses are within the budgeted amount for 2008. <br />If authorized, final design would begin in January, 2009, and would be a part of the 2009 budget. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.