My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Master Development Plan Draft
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
City Council
>
City Council Packets
>
2000-2009
>
2008
>
10-13-08-R
>
Master Development Plan Draft
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/13/2008 11:28:29 AM
Creation date
10/13/2008 11:25:47 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
Document
Master Development Plan Draft
General - Type
Master Development Plan Draft
Date
10/13/2008
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
81
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />Aged in such a way that it is close to turning over <br />Two large parcels on prime corner <br />Little in the area that needs to be preserved <br />Narrow street and bridge <br />Banners on light poles <br />Open green space, landscaping, and mature trees (9) <br />Quality parks nearby, undeveloped areas, and trails (3) <br />Close to beach <br />Need to include environmental concerns and impact in planning future development <br />Wide street has potential for landscaping or boulevard <br /> <br />Weaknesses <br /> <br />Scum on pond, brings mosquitoes <br />Doesn't draw strangers to existing businesses <br />Low Patronage by majority(?) of residents <br />Retail trending to downscae/vacancies/transient (6) <br />Ugly Bingo Parlor, bingo traffic (3) <br />Poor mix of businesses, needs grocery store, needs variety, small businesses (8) <br />Existing business are struggling (2) <br />Large existing businesses are unlikely to want to change, or difficult to redevelop compatibly <br />(2) <br />Lack of good restaurants/dining/neighborhood cafe/ethnic /healthy (9) <br />Lack of night time activity <br /> <br />Weak potential for residential/mixed use <br />Lack of residential housing to make it feel more like a downtown <br />Rail makes residential uses unattractive <br /> <br />Architecture is blah and uninteresting, no public square, lack of diversity (3) <br />Not attractive buildings, blank walls, too much asphalt (3) <br />Setbacks are inconsistent - no real '''flow'' visually on E2 <br />Somewhat chaotic visually, lacks obvious plan, especially on north side ofE (3) <br />Needs more continuity architecturally, non-uniform architecture, needs harmony (4) <br />Arden Plaza needs a new look, better signage, outdated office pods (4) <br />Lack of community gathering spot, central park (2) <br />No gateway entrance identification, bad signage (2) <br />No cultural or art attractions <br />More Green, trees, etc (2) <br />Needs decorative lighting (3) <br />Too many parking lots right on County Road E <br /> <br />No Access to Public Transit (3) <br />Area is not bicycle and pedestrian friendly, needs more connectivity through City, especially <br />from west, few sidewalks and bike paths (15) <br />Lack of sidewalk on north side of E (2) <br />No designated bike trail, better bike access through city (5) <br />Poor pedestrianlbike access across 51, bad bridge, too narrow, unsafe (14) <br /> <br />Lousy/unsafe access for vehicles, turning onto Lexington is difficult, poor circulation (3) <br /> <br />B-2 County Road E District Master Plan <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.