Laserfiche WebLink
<br />When URSA was purchased, it was a "pre-order" since it was still in the development stage. <br />Software development delays are not uncommon, and we have since learned that a primary <br />reason for URSA's delay was a delay in Microsoft's newest 2008 SQL database software. This <br />database program is used "behind the scenes" by many software products. The SQL database <br />software was scheduled to be shipped by the end of 2007 but was not released until August 2008, <br />which impacted completing and refining all of the functions in URSA. Additionally, based on <br />user comments at the September 2008 training session, further modifications were made to <br />streamline the program before it was released. Although they seemed confident of their <br />December 31, 2008, release date, the final tweaks were not completed. Nevertheless, we <br />understand that the City and staff cannot wait indefinitely for this program as new release dates <br />come and go. <br /> <br />Of the more than 800 cities using PTWIN, approximately 200 pre-ordered the software. Since <br />we pre-ordered the software, we did receive a $1200 discount. If the Council prefers that we <br />obtain the full refund from URSA, we will immediately move forward with reviewing and <br />recommending an alternative software package. URSA will give a full refund, which is $2,395. <br />Due to our expressed frustration to Black Bear Systems, they have already agreed to void the <br />$1,125 charge for the September 2008 training sessions and to give us a free round of training if <br />we decide to wait for the final release. <br /> <br />Proposed Work Plan <br /> <br />Instead of focusing on the software release date, we propose setting an implementation deadline <br />of June 30, 2009. By this date, we propose to have one of the software options fully installed <br />and operational. If URSA is not available in time to be fully implemented and operational by <br />June 30, an alternative software package will be chosen that can be implemented by that date. In <br />the meantime, we will continue our process of re-evaluating Permit Works, Local Government <br />Manager, and other software options that may have become available or updated in the last year. <br />While we can continue to pursue Springbrook's permit software as an option, the upfront and <br />ongoing maintenance costs appear to be prohibitive. We further propose to have a <br />recommendation for an alternative software package no later than February 27, 2009. <br /> <br />Page 3 of3 <br />