My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
7A, County Road E Pedestrian Improvements
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
City Council
>
City Council Packets
>
2000-2009
>
2009
>
05-26-09-R
>
7A, County Road E Pedestrian Improvements
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/2/2024 8:45:45 AM
Creation date
5/22/2009 9:33:28 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
Document
County Road E Pedestrian Improvements
General - Type
County Road E Pedestrian Improvements
Date
5/26/2009
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
16
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />5/22/2009 <br />Page 2 <br /> <br /> <br />accommodate a future wider bridge at CR E. Trail connections would also be constructed to tie the <br />pedestrian bridge into the existing sidewalk to the east and shoulder to the west. <br /> <br />City staff reviewed proposals submitted by the firms in its engineering pool, and is recommending <br />Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. for this work. <br /> <br />DISCUSSION <br />Proposals were submitted by four firms in the engineering pool: Bonestroo, Kimley-Horn and <br />Associates, Inc., SRF Inc., and WSB and Associates, Inc. Since we did not create a structural pool, <br />firms with structural departments were asked to respond to our request for quotes. <br /> <br />The proposal amounts are listed below: <br /> <br />Consultant Alternative I Alternative 2 <br />Bonestroo $97,268 $238,545 <br />Kimley-Horn $32,360 $78,555 <br />SRF $106,017 $145,060 <br />WSB $37,400 $164,000 <br /> <br />Staff reviewed the proposals for project understanding and staff experience as well as costs. Staff <br />recommends Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. for this work. Kimley-Horn staff is experienced in <br />bridge projects, including both improvements to existing bridges and new bridge construction. <br />Kimley-Horn staff has worked on other projects that fall within Mn/DOT's jurisdiction, and is <br />familiar with their rules and requirements on bridge projects. Kimley-Horn provided some technical <br />assistance during a meeting with the Mn/DOT Bridge Office in March. City staff has had a positive <br />experience with this firm and feels the proposal that has been submitted best meets the intent of the <br />project and the City's needs. <br /> <br />ADDITIONAL INFORMATION <br />At the May 18 Worksession the City Council asked for additional information relating to this project. <br /> <br />Lifespan of a standalone pathway bridge: With proper maintenance, the typical life of this type of <br />bridge is expected to be about 50 years. <br /> <br />Maintenance costs of a standalone pathway bridge: Assuming a concrete deck to accommodate snow <br />plowing, maintenance would include: <br />. Washing the bridge 1-2 times a year to keep the deck clean and free of dirt and other <br />debris. <br />· Depending on surface treatments (paint, aesthetics, etc.), repainting may be required <br />every 10 years or so, at an estimated cost of$3,000-$5,000 <br />· If any wood or other "soft" material is used on the bridge, this may need treatment or <br />replacement every 5 years or so, at an estimated cost of$2,000 to $3,000 <br /> <br />Does a standalone pathway bridge need to be fenced in? MnlDOT indicated that fencing is required <br />to prevent objects from being thrown off the bridge; however, a full enclosure is not required. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.