|
<br />Capital Improvement Plan
<br />City of Arden Hills, Minnesota
<br />
<br />2010 thru2014
<br />
<br />Contact Engineer
<br />Department Street Department
<br />
<br />Project #
<br />
<br />Type lmprovelnent
<br />Useful Life
<br />
<br />Project Name Snelling Avenue PMP (2012)
<br />
<br />Category Streets: Reconstruction
<br />Priority nla
<br />
<br />Total Project Cost $2,]30,000
<br />
<br />Descripti on t
<br />
<br />The existing roadway has a minimal storm water management system in place. Records indicate that Snelling A venue was crack sealed and seal
<br />coated in ] 996. City staff win televise the utility lines to determine the extent of any necessary repairs.
<br />
<br />Snelling Ave, Cummings Ln, Hamline (Co Rd E - Dead end)
<br />
<br />Justification
<br />
<br />I
<br />
<br />Records indicate Snelling Avenue was crack sealed and seal coated in } 996. The existing roadway currently has a minimal storm water Inanagement
<br />system in place.
<br />
<br />Snelling from TH51 to Co Rd E, 2005 PCI = 34, 2008 PCI = 31
<br />Cummings Lane from Snelling to deadend, 2005 PCI = 61, 2008 PCI = 67
<br />Hamline from Co Rd E to deadend, 2005 PCI = 54, 2008 PCI = 55
<br />
<br />Utilities
<br />Watennain - no history of problems
<br />Sanitary Sewer - no history of problems, install chimney seals on all manholes; correct any 1&1 deficiencies.
<br />Stonn Sewer - project must meet Rice Creek Watershed District requirements; improvements will improve water quality to Lake Johanna.
<br />
<br />In order to better understand the project costs for this road segment, staff recommends ordering the feasibility report for this project in 20 10.
<br />Results of the feasibility report will better estimate actual construction costs, as the report will include the recolnmended road width, section, storm
<br />sewer requirements, etc.
<br />
<br />Expenditures 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 T ota}
<br />Planning/Design 213,000 213,000
<br />Construction/Maintenance 1,810,500 106,500 1,917,000
<br />Total 213,000 1,810,500 106,500 2,130,000
<br />
<br />Funding Sources
<br />Capital Improvement Funds {PI
<br />Sanitary Sewer Utility Fund
<br />State Aid Funds
<br />Surface Water Mgmt UtiHty Fu
<br />Water Utility Funds
<br />
<br />2010
<br />169,000
<br />2,000
<br />
<br />2011
<br />
<br />2012
<br />536,500
<br />17,000
<br />900,000
<br />340,000
<br />17,000
<br />1,810,500
<br />
<br />2013
<br />84,500
<br />1,000
<br />
<br />2014
<br />
<br />Total
<br />790,000
<br />20,000
<br />900,000
<br />400,000
<br />20,000
<br />
<br />2,130,000
<br />
<br />40,000
<br />2,000
<br />
<br />213,000
<br />
<br />20,000
<br />1,000
<br />
<br />106,500
<br />
<br />Total
<br />
<br />Operational Impact/Other I
<br />
<br />The street has deteriorated past the point where other forms of maintenance are cost-effective. Long-term, reconstruction will provide a consistent
<br />roadway section that will reduce costs associated with patching potholes and other pavement failures. Monitoringhnaintenance wi} be required for
<br />new stoffilwater fe(itures that are not resident-maintained rain gardens.
<br />
<br />Produced Using the Plan-It Capital Planning Software
<br />
<br />Thursday. June 11. 2()()l)
<br />
|