4H, Approve PC 09-010 for a Conditional Use Permit Amendement at 1411 Paul Kirwold Drive

Home Browse Search

Findin!!s of Fact The Planning Commission offers the following twenty findings of fact for review: General Findings: 1. The proposal is for a 1,800 square foot addition to the south side of the Ramsey County Sherriff Patrol Station. 2. The additional is to create space for a new Disaster Recovery Computer Center. 3. The recovery center would not require any additional employees on site. 4. The addition would maintain the same height and design as the existing Ramsey County Sherriff Patrol Station. 5. Public uses are a conditional use in the Civic Center District. 6. The Ramsey County Public Works Facility was approved through a CUP (PC# 03-008). 7. The Ramsey County Sherriff Patrol Station was approved through a CUP Amendment (PC# 03-026). 8. An amendment to the CUP is required because of the proposed exterior modifications to the building and site. 9. The proposal does not impact the City's landscaping or tree preservation requirements. 10. The proposal will not impact existing extemallighting on the site. 11. No new rooftop mechanical equipment would be added as part of the proposal. 12. The proposal will not affect the amount of parking on the site. 13. The proposal is not expected to have any affect on traffic to the site or on-site traffic circulation. On the Conditional Use Permit Evaluation Criteria: 14. The proposed plan would not have any expected impact on traffic or parking conditions. 15. The proposed plan will not produce any permanent noise, glare, odors, vibration, smoke, dust, air pollution, heat, liquid or solid waste, and other nuisance characteristics. 16. The proposed plan will not impact drainage because the drainage is not being altered. 17. The proposed plan will not impact population density because the proposed use is not residential. 18. The proposed plan is not expected to have a significant impact on visual and land use compatibility with uses and structures on surrounding land or adjoining land values because the use is not changing and the visual impacts of the proposed changes are an improvement to what is existing. 19. Park dedications are not applicable. 20. The proposed plan does not conflict with the general purpose and intent of the Zoning Code or the Comprehensive Plan for the City. City of Arden Hills City Council Meetingfor July 13, 2009 \ \Metro-inet\ardenhills\Admin\Council\Agendas & Packet Information \2009\07-13-09 Regular\Packet Information \07-13-09 - Regular Meeting- Memo - RCPW CUP A mendment, doc Page 2 of3