My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
04-26-09-R
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
City Council
>
City Council Minutes
>
2000-2009
>
2009
>
04-26-09-R
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/3/2024 12:11:31 AM
Creation date
7/16/2009 9:56:33 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
Document
Regular City Council Meeting Minutes
General - Type
Minutes
Date
4/26/2009
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
29
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
AR—DEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL May 26, 2009 20 <br /> Councilmember Holden stated that she would want to accept the bids for both <br /> alternatives; approving for Alternative 2 the funding for the Federal Funding <br /> application and administrative costs and approving for Alternative 1 no activity at <br /> this time. <br /> City Engineer Bloom clarified that the Council wanted to authorize moving <br /> forward with points 1.1 and 1.2 for Alternative 1 and points 2.1 and 2.2 for <br /> Alternative 2 (located on page 6 of the Kimley-Horn document) and wait to move <br /> forward with final specs until funding has been secured. She clarified that the <br /> consultants will not be moving ahead with anything until the funding has been taken <br /> care of. <br /> Mayor Harpstead clarified that he would be interested in support from outside <br /> engineering consultants to attend the Mn/DOT meetings as it pertains to points 1.1 <br /> and 1.2 on Alternative 1. <br /> Councilmember Holmes stated that point 1.2 could be included with assistance <br /> with the variance. She would recommend deleting the dates on page 7 of the <br /> document. <br /> Councilmember Grant stated that 1.2 includes design plans and he would not <br /> approve having. plans done if Mn/DOT comes back and says that Alternative 1 is <br /> not feasible. <br /> Councilmember Holmes stated that the Council should trust the engineers to not <br /> move forward with having plans drawn up if Mn/DOT determines that Alternative 1 <br /> is not going to work. <br /> Councilmember Grant stated that as soon as Mn/DOT says it is approved then the <br /> Council can approve moving forward with 1.2. <br /> Councilmember Holden stated that Council could accept the bids and instruct <br /> Staff regarding additional Council direction. <br /> Councilmember Holmes stated that the first paragraph on page 7 should be <br /> deleted. <br /> Mayor Harpstead stated that Staff would be instructed to move forward with the <br /> grant application before the contract is signed. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.