My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
7B, Amendment to City Code Regarding Antennas & Towers
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
City Council
>
City Council Packets
>
2000-2009
>
2009
>
07-27-09-R
>
7B, Amendment to City Code Regarding Antennas & Towers
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/30/2009 11:08:59 AM
Creation date
7/30/2009 11:05:43 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
Document
City Code Regarding Antennas & Towers
General - Type
City Code Regarding Antennas & Towers
Date
7/27/2009
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
26
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />Commissioner Holewa confirmed that if a new structure would need to be built <br />the requirement would be that they would have to leave space for another user. <br />He thought that there may be a difference in cost if space for another user would <br />be required. <br /> <br />Commissioner Stodola questioned if the Bethel tower would then not conform to <br />the requirements. <br /> <br />City Planner Beekman advised that the Bethel property is unique in that it is so <br />large and would be hard to determine the primary building. She stated that the <br />tower would actually conform to the new regulations. <br /> <br />Commissioner Holewa questioned how a traditional television antenna would be <br />measured, as the measurements would not be the same as dish antennae. <br /> <br />City Planner Beekman advised that type of antennae would be measured the same <br />as any other antennae and would not be exempt. <br /> <br />Chair Larson questioned if those types of antennas would be allowed. <br /> <br />City Planner Beekman advised that they are not currently regulated. <br /> <br />Commissioner Holewa thought that type of antennae should be exempt. <br /> <br />Chair Larson thought that a statement should be added to address a roof mounted <br />television antennae and ham radio antennae. <br /> <br />Commissioner Zimmerman questioned if a statement should be added to state that <br />type of television antennae should be exempt, as it would be for their own <br />personal television reception, for reception only and not transmission. <br /> <br />Chad Nolan stated that standard home antennae would only receive and would not <br />transmit a signal out. <br /> <br />Chair Larson opened the public hearing at 7:12 p.m. <br /> <br />Chair Larson invited anyone for or against the application to come forward and <br />make comment. <br /> <br />Richard Gonzalez, property owner on Lake Johanna, stated that he was a ham <br />radio operator and was concerned that non-commercial antennae were not <br />included in the regulations. He asked for further clarification. <br /> <br />City Planner Beekman stated that her interpretation of the reading did not <br />specifically address non-commercial antennas. She stated that they would not be <br />exempt unless they met the requirements discussed. She advised that the <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.