My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
06-29-09-R
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
City Council
>
City Council Minutes
>
2000-2009
>
2009
>
06-29-09-R
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/19/2009 10:52:43 AM
Creation date
8/19/2009 10:51:51 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
Document
Regular Council Minutes
General - Type
Regular Council Minutes
Date
6/29/2009
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
35
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL - June 29, 2009 <br /> <br />29 <br /> <br />Mayor Pro Tem McClung stated that he had talked with several residents at that <br />Representative McCollum meeting and would not say that the Resolution reflected <br />what the majority of residents wanted. <br /> <br />The amended motion was called to a vote. The motion carried (3-1 - Mayor Pro <br />Tem McClung). <br /> <br />Councilmember Holden stated that in the past the City has not utilized the <br />Environmental Attorney as well as they should especially in critical times. She <br />asked what Council was envisioning the role of this person because if this person is <br />going to be involved then they need to be copied in on the e-mails and <br />correspondence, and participating in meetings such as the upcoming Army/GSA <br />meeting. If the City is going to utilize this person then guidelines should be <br />established on how this person is going to be utilized. <br /> <br />Mayor Pro Tem McClung stated that since the City does not have a Preliminary <br />Development Agreement, the Environmental Attorney was no longer a budgeted <br />item and he would not support the continued expenditures on consultants for the <br />TCAAP property when the City was not bringing forth the proposal. <br /> <br />Councilmember Grant stated that the City was still dealing with property that <br />needs to be cleaned up and the City needs to have someone who understands the ins <br />and outs of dealing with environmental issues and transfer issues. Incurring the <br />cost for the environmental attorney would be wise and prudent. <br /> <br />Councilmember Holmes stated that she would agree with Councilmember Grant <br />and Councilmember Holden. She stated that the meeting with the Army/GSA is in <br />a couple of weeks and the transfer of the property would be discussed. The City <br />needs to be sure they are protecting the residents. She asked Community <br />Development Director Lehnhoff if there was money in the TCAAP Fund or if there <br />were some contingencies in the budget that would cover these costs. <br /> <br />Community Development Director Lehnhoff stated that he did not have this <br />information at this time and would report back to the Council in an Administrative <br />Update. <br /> <br />City Administrator Moorse stated that he was not sure what funds were readily <br />available in the TCAAP Fund but he would report back to the Council. <br /> <br />Councilmember Holden stated that at the meeting in July the Army/GSA could <br />decide to put the property up for public auction and if the City does not have the <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.