My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
12-15-09 PTRC
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
Commissions, Committees, and Boards
>
Parks, Trails and Recreation Committee (PTRC)
>
PTRC Minutes/Packets/(1968 to 2009)
>
1999-2009
>
2009
>
12-15-09 PTRC
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/10/2024 12:08:10 AM
Creation date
12/10/2009 8:41:39 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
Document
PTRC Packet
General - Type
PTRC Packet
Date
12/15/2009
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
34
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
PARKS, TRAILS AND RECREATION COMMITTEE MEETING MINUTES <br /> November 17, 2009 <br /> Page 2 of 7 <br /> A. Park Funding Presentation—Special Legislation—Mel Aanerud(continued) <br /> Mr. Aanerud indicated a local community could now establish a five year, ten Y <br /> or year two year <br /> Y <br /> plan for parks with specific funds. He stated the County would then assess accordingly and set <br /> aside funds for park expenses without excessive fees going to bonding agents.ents. At this time the <br /> Three Rivers Parks Board would endorse this piece of legislation if done at a regional level. <br /> Mr. Aanerud explained how the park fund would work if there was an excess and stated the <br /> legislation would need to create language to cover the funding after the five or ten years of the <br /> plan. He stated that Senator Foley and Congressman Newton were currently carrying the <br /> Y g <br /> legislation. The Anoka County Parks Department has endorsed it as well. <br /> Mr. Aanerud stated he was spreading the word on this piece of legislation to pp <br /> gain support from <br /> g <br /> neighboring communities to assist in creating park plans while setting aside funding to assist in <br /> these expenses. He asked the Committee for comments or questions and also asked for their <br /> support. <br /> Council Liaison Holmes questioned how large projects could be p <br /> expensed to the population and <br /> P <br /> if they could be spread out over two years. <br /> Mr. Aanerud explained that large projects could be done over several ears, as is being done with <br /> Y g <br /> a trail corridor in his community at this time. He stated this would have to be spelled out within <br /> the legislative plan. <br /> Chair Peck asked that staff explain how park items are being funded at this time. <br /> Ms. Olson stated most cities use the park dedication fee andspecial revenue fund to cover park <br /> items. She indicated that this fund was dwindling and additional funds would need to be <br /> transferred through the PIR fund. State regulations do not allow for maintenance projects to be <br /> funded from the special revenue fund. <br /> Mr. Aanerud explained that bonding was the only option at this time and that with it came <br /> interest and other bonding fees. The special legislation would eliminate the interest and bonding <br /> fees and the funds would become more cost effective. <br /> Council Liaison Holmes stated most of the park projects are done through matching ants and <br /> � g g �' <br /> taken from the capital improvement fund. She indicated she felt this special legislation was a <br /> i p g <br /> very good idea and would support it going forward. <br /> Further discussion ensued regarding the timeline of the legislation. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.